Motivating Individuals and Groups at Work: A Social Identity Perspective on Leadership and Group Performance

By N. Ellemers, Dick de Gilder, S. A. Haslam. 2004

462 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c772df679e94a465761a3b321942dff66fc035e0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Why and how does shared language affect subsidiary knowledge inflows? A social identity perspective (2015, background): “In general, scholars have pointed to HR practices as an important source of identification (Ellemers et al., 2004).”
Bridging corporate social responsibility and compassion at work (2014, background): “Drawing on social identity theory, employee perceptions of CSR trigger members’ intrinsic motivations for the further development of organizational identity (Ellemers et al., 2004).”
Supervisor-nurse relationships, teamwork, role ambiguity and well-being: public versus private sector nurses (2011, unknown): “The role in embedding the behaviour of sharing information and giving support depends in the first instance on the general role modelling behaviour of supervisors (Ellemers, Gilder, and Haslam 2004).”
Social Identities and Commitments at Work: Toward an Integrative Model. (2006, background): “This topic is broad and highly complex but, fortunately, there have been a number of comprehensive reviews of the identity literature that summarize key issues (Ashmore et al., 2004; Ellemers et al., 2004; Haslam, 2004; Haslam & Ellemers, 2005).”
Perceived external prestige and internal respect: New insights into the organizational identification process (2006, background): “Another aspect of organizational status thought to influence an individual’s identification with the organization and subsequent behavior is his or her perceived status within the organization (Ellemers et al., 2004; Tyler, 1999; Tyler & Blader, 2002; Tyler et al., 1996).”