The preference for predeparture or postarrival cross‐cultural training – An exploratory approach
By J. Selmer. 2001
112 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c76fe02483f37e50026b57f9b6636fb45b78c706
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- M. Paley
- M. Campion
- Eduardo Salas
- Sharon L. Riedel
- Marie-France Waxin
- S. Shin
- K. Hess
- Alexandra Panaccio
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Political Science and International Relations
- M. Paley
- Eduardo Salas
- Sharon L. Riedel
- Marie-France Waxin
- K. Hess
- Alexandra Panaccio
- Lisa N. Littrell
Citations in the corpus
- What you do depends on where you are: understanding how domestic and expatriate work requirements depend upon the cultural context (2007, background): “Selmer (2001) has argued that behavioral training is more effective in the post-arrival stage than in the pre-departure stage because expatriates tend to be more motivated to learn once they are in their assignment.”
- Expatriate Preparation: A Critical Analysis of 25 Years of Cross-Cultural Training Research (2006, methodology): “Specifically, many controversies continue to plague the literature with respect to the goals, content, effectiveness, and processes of CCT (Baumgarten, 1995; Brewster, 1995; Selmer, 2001; Selmer, Torbiörn, & de Leon, 1998; Tung, 1981).”
- CROSS-CULTURAL TRAINING TO FACILITATE EXPATRIATE ADJUSTMENT: IT WORKS ! (2005, background): “Briody and Chrisman (1991) and Selmer (2001) report that some expatriates and their families would have preferred to receive the training in the host country.”