Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Organizational Endowments and the Performance of University Start-ups

By Scott A. Shane, Toby E. Stuart. Management Sciences, 2002

1,459 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7273eedd03ad256df79d8ecffc1e3d3cf3eaee4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Home Sweet Home: Entrepreneurs' Location Choices and the Performance of Their Ventures (2010, background): “Entrepreneurs with direct and indirect connections to venture capitalists have the highest probability of securing financing from them (Shane and Stuart 2002).”
What do business models do? Narratives, calculation and market exploration (2009, positive): “Several types of resources - human, social or financial critical to academic entrepreneurship have been identified (Mustar, 1997; Shane and Stuart, 2002; Wright et al., 2004a, 2004b).”
The performance of university spin-offs: an exploratory analysis using venture capital data (2009, background): “In several studies, Shane and his coauthors investigate ‘‘university spin-offs’’ as start-ups exploiting university inventions but not necessarily founded by university employees (Shane and Stuart 2002; Di Gregorio and Shane 2003; Nerkar and Shane 2003; Shane 2004).”
Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework (2008, background): “Shane and Stuart (2002) offered empirical evidence of the network-performance relationship, analyzing how social capital endowments of the founders affect the likelihood of three critical outcomes of spinoffs: attracting venture capital financing, experiencing initial public offerings (IPOs) and fa”
Cocreation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The Case of Enterprise Software (2012, background): “Indeed, studies have examined how endorsements from venture capitalists (Gulati and Higgins 2003; Shane and Stuart 2002), investment banks (Gulati and Higgins 2003; Stuart et al.”
Institutional change and resource endowments to science-based entrepreneurial firms (2005, background): “Shane and Stuart, 2002, studying MIT spin-offs and Jacob et al., 2003, studying Chalmers University of Technology), allowing other researchers and policy makers to discern the applicability of the findings to their own contexts.”
Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? (2003, background): “research on the TLO start-ups from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) indicates that roughly 20% of these companies experience an initial public offering ( Shane and Stuart, 2002 ).”
The genetic basis of entrepreneurship: Effects of gender and personality (2009, background): “…provide more resources and information needed to discover and exploit opportunities (Aldrich & Zimmer, 1986; Busenitz, 1996; Johansson, 2000) and can lead to better venture performance (Aldrich, Rosen, & Woodward, 1987; Bruderl & Preisendorfer, 1998; Reynolds & White, 1997; Shane & Stuart, 2002).”
When do start-ups that exploit patented academic knowledge survive? (2003, background): “…been offered for the differential survival of university start-ups, including the psychology of the founders (Roberts, 1991), their social ties (Shane and Stuart, 2002), or the university from which they come (Saxenian, 1990), no researchers have examined the effects of the technology…”
Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities (2005, background): “University spinoffs are an import ubset of start-up firms because they are an eco cally powerful group of high technology compan Shane and Stuart, 2002; Heirman and Clarysse, 2). ccording to the Association of University Technolo anagers (AUTM), spinoffs from American academ nstitutions between…”