Explaining the Adoption of Innovation: An Empirical Analysis of Public Management Reform
By George A. Boyne, J. Gould-Williams, Jennifer Law, R. M. Walker. 2005
152 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c717f0d03c7f895426e3c410e35dbba572cf057c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
- E. Straub
- A. Arundel
- C. Avellaneda
- Luca Casali
- Hugo Hollanders
- B. Ferguson
- Carter Bloch
- R. M. Walker
In Public Administration
- C. Avellaneda
- A. Arundel
- E. Straub
- Frances S. Berry
- Luca Casali
- Hugo Hollanders
- Carter Bloch
- B. Ferguson
Citations in the corpus
- How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods (2015, background): “Under some governance and contextual conditions, agency managers could be able to implement strategies that encourage inhouse innovative capabilities, for instance by supporting the trial and error testing of innovations or the evaluation of good ideas suggested by staff (Boyne et al., 2005).”
- Internal and External Antecedents of Process Innovation: A review and extension (2014, background): “The majority of the studies examined surveyed one respondent from each organization, the exceptions being those in Demark, England and Wales (Boyne et al., 2005; Walker, 2006, 2008; Hansen, 2010).7 The rest of the studies use a combination of secondary and survey data, with seven using only survey…”
- Understanding Technology Adoption: Theory and Future Directions for Informal Learning (2009, methodology): “Rogers’s theory has influenced other research of adoption and diffusion (Boyne et al., 2005; Deffuant et al., 2005; Pennington, 2004; Venkatesh et al., 2003).”
- Social Return on Investment (SROI) and Performance Measurement (2013, background): “Boyne et al , 2005 ; Kitchener et al , 2000 ), the use of multiple measures allowed us to uncover some unique variance which otherwise may have been neglected by single methods.”
- The dual effects of the Internet of Things (IoT): A systematic review of the benefits and risks of IoT adoption by organizations (2020, background): “As suggested by Boyne et al. (2005), the successful usage of technology is dependent on constraints which include: 1) the context within which public organizations operate (Buonanno et al., 2005; Damanpour & Gopalakrishnan, 1998; Damanpour & Schneider, 2006; Quinn & Hall, 1983), 2) the…”
- Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals (2019, background): “These include knowledge sourcing and collaboration with other public sector organizations (Sorensen and Torfing, 2012), management capabilities (Audit Commission, 2007; Pärna and von Tunzelmann, 2007), the personal characteristics of managers themselves, such as their level of education, previous ex”
- Exploring The Diffusion Of Innovation Among High And Low Innovative Localities (2011, background): “Compatibility of the innovation with existing practices is likely to be an important variable because public organizations are typically implementing incremental innovations that build upon what has gone before (Boyne et al. 2005; Miles 2005).”