Web Surveys
By S. Crawford, Mick Couper, Mark J. Lamias. 2001
500 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6e04b4aa553a151aea69965decb5c9f245aa381
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jesse J. Chandler
- Gabriele Paolacci
- B. Shuck
- Susan R. Komives
- T. C. Segar
- M. Denscombe
- Gwenith G Fisher
- Geert Loosveldt
Citations in the corpus
- Employee engagement: an examination of antecedent and outcome variables (2011, methodology): “Further, similar studies of this type indicated response rates upwards of 30% (Crawford et al., 2001).”
- Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review (2010, background): “Researchers also made technical suggestions for designing invitations (Crawford et al., 2001; Heerwegh, 2005; Kaczmirek, 2005; Peytchev et al., 2006; Whitcomb & Porter, 2004).”
- Conducting Online Surveys (2006, background): “Although the number of individuals and households with Internet access is increasing, the present penetration of the technology does not permit its use for such surveys (see, Dillman et al., 1998a; Van Dijk, 2000; Crawford, et al., 2001; Miller et al., 2002).”
- An evaluation of the weighting procedures for an online access panel survey (2008, methodology): “…answers can be rapidly collected and analysed due to extensive automation (Bandilla et al. 2003:235), there are also 93 disadvantages to online access panel surveys, of which the most important are non-coverage and sample selection difficulties (Bandilla et al. 2003; Dillman 2000; Couper 2000).”
- Item non‐response rates: a comparison of online and paper questionnaires (2009, methodology): “…might impact on the representativeness of online samples, and investigating techniques for encouraging people to return their questionnaires (e.g. Couper 2000; Couper, Kapteyn, Schonlau, & Winter, 2007; Couper, Tourangeau, Conrad, & Crawford, 2004; Deutskens, de Ruyter, & Wetzels, 2006; Dillman,…”