Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method

By Barry Bozeman. 2003

1,482 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6db7c800dec4bf97d0ab4dfab2115c2fc13d845

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Situating and Constructing Diversity in Semi-Structured Interviews (2015, background): “The face-to-face administration of the SSI has both advantages and disadvantages (Shuy, 2001).”
Interviewing as a Data Collection Method: A Critical Review (2014, background): “Gubrium & Holstein (2002) point out that, unlike the structured interview, this kind of interviewing is an open situation through which a greater flexibility and freedom is offered to both sides (i.e. interviewers and interviewees), in terms of planning, implementing and organising the interview…”
Questions, questioning, and institutional practices: an introduction (2009, methodology): “Survey interviews emerged from the practices of political polling and market research and became a key social science research method by the 1970s (Platt, 2002), with methodological texts devoted entirely to considering the best ways to word and sequence questions (e.g. Bradburn et al., 1979, 2004).”
Interviewing the terrorists: reflections on fieldwork and implications for psychological research (2012, background): “The term ‘interview’ is unspecific because it is used in a variety of different ways (Gubrium & Holstein, 2001 ).”
The influence of flexible work arrangements on employee engagement: An exploratory study (2020, background): “The purpose of semi-structured, open-ended questions was to allow participants to be more intimate while engaging and to acquire more data (Gubrium & Holstein, 2001).”
Linking academic emotions and student engagement: mature-aged distance students’ transition to university (2015, background): “This underrepresentation of men is compounded by a general reluctance of men to share their emotional experiences (Schwalbe and Wolkomir 2002).”
Duration, Dominance and Depth in Telephone and Face-to-Face Interviews: A Comparative Exploration (2011, background): “Clearly, the mode will also be impractical where participants do not have access to a telephone or have difficulties hearing (Wenger, 2002; Worth & Tierney, 1993).”
The teller-focused interview: Interviewing as a relational practice (2014, background): “An interest in the interview’s character of interplay between people (e.g. Gubrium et al., 2012; Mishler, 1991) has emerged.”
Learning to Interview in the Social Sciences (2003, background): “…from a pedagogical standpoint because within the context of a course designed to develop students’ interviewing skills, a primary purpose is to examine the transcriptions produced not so much for the content of what was said but how accounts were coproduced by speakers (the process) (Poland, 2002).”
Open-Ended Interviews, Power, and Emotional Labor (2007, background): “Some scholars ask “whether the process of coding interview responses for research purposes itself disenfranchises respondents, transforming their narratives into terms foreign to what their original sensibilities might have been” (Gubrium and Holstein 2002, 20).”
Elicitation Techniques: Getting People to Talk About Ideas They Don’t Usually Talk About (2015, background): “Although elicitation techniques have no single or authoritative definition, the concept most often refers to research tasks that use visual, verbal, or written stimuli to encourage people to share their ideas (e.g., Johnson & Weller, 2002).”
An Exemplar for Combining the Collection, Analysis, and Interpretations of Verbal and Nonverbal Data in Qualitative Research (2014, background): “In other words, interviews provide qualitative researchers with opportunities for obtaining thick description (Geertz, 1973) and, hence, meaning making (Warren, 2002).”
On Becoming a Qualitative Researcher: The Value of Reflexivity (2007, background): “Based on my reading (e.g., Gubrium & Holstein, 2002; Kvale, 1996; Merriam, 1998; Patton, 2002; Seidman, 1998; Spradley, 1979), I decided interviews would be informal and conversational; exploratory, flexible, with open-ended questions.”
Interactional problems in research interviews (2014, background): “Koivunen (2010) theorizes interview refusals via the concepts of power and gender, and Adler and Adler (2002) devote a chapter to describing a range of ‘reluctant respondents’, including those who are secretive, advantaged, or disadvantaged, as well as participants discussing sensitive topics.”