Evidence for bivariate systems: An empirical test of appetition and aversion across domains

By Shelly L. Gable, H. T. Reis, A. Elliot. 2003

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6c6ff55e3a3478f70c70b6bb794aa6379e519d4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Using preference, motivation and aversion tests to ask scientific questions about animals’ feelings (2006, background): “In psychology, the terms ‘appetence’, ‘appetency’ and ‘appetition’ have been used interchangeably to refer to appetitive motivations and to distinguish them from aversion (e.g., Baldwin, 1901; Dussault, 1996; Cacioppo and Berntson, 1999; Gable et al., 2003).”
Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. (2002, background): “…with an examination of the items commonly used to assess the constructs under consideration, leads us to propose that the shared variance among these constructs may be interpreted in terms of approach and avoidance motivation (see Carver et al., 2000; Gable et al., 2002, for related proposals).”
How was your day? Couples’ affect when telling and hearing daily events (2008, background): “Increasingly, researchers investigating the affect-regulating functions of close relationships have begun to examine affective change in response to more commonplace, day-to-day experiences instead of just major life events (e.g., Bolger et al., 2000; Gable, Reis, & Elliot, 2003; Murray, Bellavia,”
To Provide or Protect: Motivational Bases of Political Liberalism and Conservatism (2009, background): “Building on early work on reward and punishment in learning and more recent research in neuroscience, psychopathology, and animal conditioning, contemporary psychologists posit two systems of self-regulation: a behavioral inhibition system, based in avoidance motivation, and a behavioral activation ”
Recommendations for Creating Better Concept Definitions in the Organizational, Behavioral, and Social Sciences (2016, methodology): “In addition, regardless of which conceptual structure is used to define the concept, Jaccard and Jaccoby (2010) have noted that it is also helpful to instantiate the concept by ‘‘specifying concrete instances of abstract concepts in order to help clarify their meaning’’ (p.”
Implicit need for achievement moderates the relationship between competence need satisfaction and subsequent motivation (2010, background): “Meanwhile, the validity of the MMG as an implicit motive measure has been repeatedly demonstrated (e.g., Gable, 2006; Gable et al., 2003; Kehr, 2004; Langens & Schmalt, 2002; Puca, 2005; Puca, Rinkenauer, & Breidenstein, 2006; Puca & Schmalt, 1999, 2001; Schüler, 2007).”
The effect of positive work reflection during leisure time on affective well-being: Results from three diary studies (2016, background): “Of theoretical importance, this pattern contradicts the notion that independent processes underlie the origin and regulation of positive and negative emotions (e.g., Carver et al., 2000; Gable et al., 2003).”
Motivation and Personality: A Neuropsychological Perspective (2013, methodology): “In the Big Five model, all traits that reflect sensitivity to punishment fall within the Neuroticism factor (DeYoung, 2010b,c; Gable et al., 2003; Markon et al., 2005).”
Good News! Capitalizing on Positive Events in an Interpersonal Context (2010, background): “…that support perceptions can be traced back to obserververified behavioral exchanges (e.g., Collins & Feeney, 2000), as well as daily diary studies showing that partners agree to a significant extent about many of their constructive and destructive interchanges (e.g., Gable et al., 2003a,b).”
EXPERIENTIAL AVOIDANCE AND FORGIVENESS AS MEDIATORS IN THE RELATION BETWEEN TRAUMATIC INTERPERSONAL EVENTS AND POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER SYMPTOMS (2005, unknown): “The potentially independent functioning of avoidance/revenge motivations and benevolence motivations is consistent with mounting evidence for the relative independence of negative and positive affective systems (see Gable, Reis, & Elliot, 2003 for a discussion of integrative appetitive–aversive sy”
The disclosure processes model: Understanding disclosure decision-making and post-disclosure outcomes among people living with a concealable stigmatized identity (2010, unknown): “In contrast, individuals who pursue avoidance goals are more likely to attend to the presence of negative stimuli (Derryberry & Reed, 1994) and interpret neutral or ambiguous stimuli in a negative light (Strachman & Gable, 2006), utilize avoidance-focused coping strategies (Gable et al., 2003), and ”
Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. (2004, unknown): “[89] found that positive events were associated with changes in PA, whereas negative events were associated with changes in NA; however, there are also some unexpected findings: negative events covaried with daily PA (reducing it); and the BIS scale predicted average daily PA (suppressing it).”