N. McNaughton

Clinical Psychology · 2004–2013

A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 21 researchers and is trusted by 14 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom N. McNaughton trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Philip J. Corr
  2. Colin G. DeYoung
  3. Joseph E LeDoux
  4. Michael Davis
  5. Lydia Krabbendam
  6. John P. O'Doherty
  7. Kristian E. Markon
  8. David E. Evans
  9. Kent C. Berridge
  10. C. Carver

Who trusts N. McNaughton overall

  1. Philip J. Corr
  2. Eric M. Anicich
  3. David J. Anderson
  4. Colin G. DeYoung
  5. Theodore P. Beauchaine
  6. Dean Mobbs
  7. E. Jonas
  8. Peter S. Dayan
  9. Jacob B Hirsh
  10. Luke D. Smillie

Papers from N. McNaughton's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers N. McNaughton trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The debate over dopamine’s role in reward: the case for incentive salience
  2. Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: an integrative hierarchical approach. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  3. Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  4. Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  5. Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  6. From prediction error to incentive salience: mesolimbic computation of reward motivation (European Journal of Neuroscience)
  7. Anger and the behavioral approach system
  8. Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: traits as density distribution of states. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  9. Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect (Cognition & Emotion)
  10. Anger is an approach-related affect: evidence and implications. (Psychological bulletin)

Their papers