To Provide or Protect: Motivational Bases of Political Liberalism and Conservatism

By R. Janoff-Bulman. 2009

209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5dfefeed617ffb84657c32911fb08bc33b7f42c5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Richard E. Petty
2. P. Briñol
3. J. Teeny
4. Joseph J. Siev
5. Kurt Gray
6. Adam Waytz
7. Zakary L. Tormala
8. Derek D. Rucker

In Social Psychology

1. Richard E. Petty
2. P. Briñol
3. Adam Waytz
4. Liane L. Young
5. Kurt Gray
6. J. Teeny
7. Joseph J. Siev
8. Zakary L. Tormala

In Sociology and Political Science

1. P. Briñol
2. Richard E. Petty
3. J. Teeny
4. Adam Waytz
5. Liane L. Young
6. Joseph J. Siev
7. Kurt Gray
8. Zakary L. Tormala

Citations in the corpus

• A Review and Conceptual Framework for Understanding Personalized Matching Effects in Persuasion (2020, background): “The bases of individuals’ attitudes can also differ as a function of their political liberalism/conservatism, where each ideology tends to correspond to different underlying values (Jost, 2017; Janoff-Bulman, 2009).”
• Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality (2012, background): “One promising approach for comparing the effects of good versus bad is provided by Janoff-Bulman and colleagues (Janoff-Bulman, 2009; Janoff-Bulman, Sheikh, & Hepp, 2009), who outlined individual differences in the psychological weight of good versus bad deeds.”