Learning facts from fiction.
By Elizabeth J. Marsh, Michelle L Meade, H. Roediger III. 2003
254 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5e0bf042418e1187dbdf6e66e889f24e05931f9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Kathryn S. McCarthy
- Danielle S. McNamara
- Raymond A. Mar
- David N. Rapp
- Keith Oatley
- Scott Andrew Crossley
- A. Graesser
- Max M. Louwerse
In Literature and Literary Theory
- Raymond A. Mar
- Keith Oatley
- Danielle S. McNamara
- Michael F. Dahlstrom
- E. Koopman
- D. McAdams
- Emanuele Castano
- D. Kidd
In Sociology and Political Science
- Raymond A. Mar
- Keith Oatley
- Danielle S. McNamara
- Michael F. Dahlstrom
- E. Koopman
- Emanuele Castano
- D. Kidd
- Jessica E. Black
Citations in the corpus
- The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience (2008, background): “The work ofMarsh and her colleagues has also demonstrated that people can adopt incorrect information from stories, although this work does not pertain to social knowledge specifically (Marsh & Fazio, 2006; Marsh et al., 2003).”
- Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences (2014, background): “Fictional narratives often contain elements within them that are truthful (58), and individuals readily use information from fictional stories to answer questions about the world (59, 60).”
- The Multidimensional Knowledge in Text Comprehension framework (2021, background): “Readers tend to be quite susceptible to inaccurate information and often lack the critical reasoning skills to notice or correct potential inaccuracies during encoding (Marsh et al., 2003; Rapp, 2016; Rapp & Braasch, 2014; Singer, 2013).”
- Can’t We Just Disregard Fake News? The Consequences of Exposure to Inaccurate Information (2018, background): “Participants are more likely to provide inaccurate responses after reading inaccurate content than after reading accurate or neutral content (e.g., Hinze, Slaten, Horton, Jenkins, & Rapp, 2014; Marsh & Fazio, 2006; Marsh et al., 2003).”
- Persuasive Effects of Fictional Narratives Increase Over Time (2007, unknown): “Shortly after reading a fictional narrative, readers are usually able to attribute information correctly to the story source, whereas the accuracy of such attributions declines after a delay, eg, 1 week ( Marsh, Meade, & Roediger, 2003 ), a pattern of results indicating either a fast decay or dissoc”