Cheating in School: What We Know and What We Can Do

By T. Mcdaniel. 2009

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Cheating in school: What we know and what we can do , is perhaps the most comprehensive and accessible text on the topic of academic integrity that I have read. Readers in the Asia-Pacific region who think the title is indicative of an interest in student cheating in the pre-tertiary sector, will be pleased to know that this book covers student cheating across the range of educational institutions, from primary (grade) school, through to the middle years, high school and post-secondary colleges and universities. I spent three days of valuable professional development reading and noting the book, often going to the numerous websites referred to, and generally refreshing my understandings of the academic integrity research and best practice from the last 15 years. It does not seem adequate to say that Davis, Drinan and Bertram Gallant should be congratulated on this carefully and elegantly constructed presentation of the field. View the PDF for the full review

Subfields: Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c532881203bda88918768bb2fa344c9e4decb7ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

1. Rowena Harper
2. K. van Haeringen
3. Cath Ellis
4. Pearl Rozenberg
5. P. Newton
6. Tracey Bretag
7. S. Saddiqui

Citations in the corpus

• Does authentic assessment assure academic integrity? Evidence from contract cheating data (2020, background): “Recent research (Bretag et al., 2018) has concurred with numerous other studies (Davis et al. 2009; Marsden, Carroll, & Neill, 2005; McCabe, Trevino, & Butterfield, 2001; Yeo, 2007) showing that a high proportion of students in Engineering admit to cheating behaviours.”
• What Contributes to College Students’ Cheating? A Study of Individual Factors (2017, background): “This finding offers empirical support to the argument that students rationalize or “neutralize” their cheating behaviors by keeping pace with peers who are involved with academic misconduct (Bolin, 2004; Daniel, Blount, & Ferrell, 1991; Davis et al., 2009; Murdock & Stephens, 2007).”