The Next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and Assessing a Hierarchical Model With 15 Facets to Enhance Bandwidth, Fidelity, and Predictive Power

By C. Soto, Oliver P. John. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2017

1,779 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Three studies were conducted to develop and validate the Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2), a major revision of the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Study 1 specified a hierarchical model of personality structure with 15 facet traits nested within the Big Five domains, and developed a preliminary item pool to measure this structure. Study 2 used conceptual and empirical criteria to construct the BFI-2 domain and facet scales from the preliminary item pool. Study 3 used data from 2 validation samples to evaluate the BFI-2’s measurement properties and substantive relations with self-reported and peer-reported criteria. The results of these studies indicate that the BFI-2 is a reliable and valid personality measure, and an important advance over the original BFI. Specifically, the BFI-2 introduces a robust hierarchical structure, controls for individual differences in acquiescent responding, and provides greater bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power than the original BFI, while still retaining the original measure’s conceptual focus, brevity, and ease of understanding. The BFI-2 therefore offers valuable new opportunities for research examining the structure, assessment, development, and life outcomes of personality traits.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5306dae8135390723dac07c5367029a72bb4cfd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

  1. Kibeom Lee
  2. M. Ashton
  3. Ingo Zettler
  4. Miloš Kankaraš
  5. Morten Moshagen
  6. J. Suárez‐Álvarez
  7. D. Danner
  8. Oliver P. John

In Clinical Psychology

  1. Ingo Zettler
  2. Kibeom Lee
  3. M. Ashton
  4. C. Soto
  5. Miloš Kankaraš
  6. Morten Moshagen
  7. Oliver P. John
  8. Benjamin E. Hilbig

Citations in the corpus