Three Kinds of Opinion Comparison: The Triadic Model

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Social Comparison: Why, With Whom, and With What Effect? (2002, background): “) If the proxy’s past relative preferences are unknown, related attributes can provide a basis for comparison, as has been demonstrated in several experiments (Suls et al., 2000).”
The impact of information from similar or different advisors on judgment (2009, result): “…verifiable facts (i.e., our " beliefs " as suggested by Suls, Martin & Wheeler, 2002), we compare our beliefs with those of others who Similar or Different Advisors 6 share similar attributes to ourselves, such as background, gender, religion, politics or general world views (Suls & Wheeler, 2000).”
The Motivational Theory of Role Modeling: How Role Models Influence Role Aspirants’ Goals (2015, background): “For example, the triadic model of opinion comparison (Suls, Martin, & Wheeler, 2000) suggests that when predicting whether one will like a certain task or activity (i.e., whether one will intrinsically value it), role aspirants look to others and their reactions to that task.”
Work value fit and turnover intention: same‐source or different‐source fit (2007, background): “In this study, employees' opinions about the values of their organization refer to what has been called “belief-type” opinions, which are potentially verifiable assertions about the true nature of an entity ( Suls et al. , 2000”