Designing a global standardized methodology for measuring social entrepreneurship activity: the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor social entrepreneurship study

By John Lepoutre, Rachida Justo, Siri Terjesen, N. Bosma. 2011

476 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c490d46cc5be33b1062f9980f5ca755345165278

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

The Prevalence and Determinants of Social Entrepreneurship at the Macro Level (2016, methodology): “Despite the thorough methodology applied by Lepoutre et al. (2013) to measure social entrepreneurship, the initial question used to identify social entrepreneurs is not without critique.”
The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (Gem) and Its Impact on Entrepreneurship Research (2013, unknown): “2010) and social entrepreneurship (Lepoutre et al. 2012).”
Beyond the Moral Portrayal of Social Entrepreneurs: An Empirical Approach to Who They Are and What Drives Them (2016, background): “In 2009, GEM conducted a special study on social entrepreneurship (Lepoutre et al. 2013).”
Informal Institutions and Their Comparative Influences on Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: The Role of In‐Group Collectivism and Interpersonal Trust (2016, methodology): “The operationalization of individual-level SE was based on earlier pilot studies2 in such a manner that the survey questions were theoretically grounded in the SE literature (Lepoutre et al. 2013).”
Social entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems: Complementary or disjoint phenomena? (2017, background): “Social entrepreneurs create innovative organizations that address societal problems using business methods – that is, by harnessing the market mechanism (Lepoutre et al., 2013; Miller et al., 2012; Roundy, 2014a; Thompson and Doherty, 2006).”
Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations (2014, methodology): “Names of the members of national teams, the global coordination team, and the financial sponsors are published in the annual GEM Reports, which can be downloaded at http://www. gemconsortium.org.”
Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda (2014, background): “…and practitioners around the world (Wilson and Post 2013) and the associated rise in scholarly interest is reflected in the growing tally of publications in the academic press about SE as a distinct category of organizations (Cukier et al. 2011; Lepoutre et al. 2013; Lumpkin et al. 2013).”