Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope

By Vivien Foster, S. Mourato. 2003

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c487b5aefd5383a017c3f29af1e23d1e97e6a264

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Decision Sciences

Citations in the corpus

What’s in a name? The use of quantitative measures versus ‘Iconised’ species when valuing biodiversity (2008, background): “Adamowicz et al. 1998a, b; Foster and Mourato 2003 )t hat it is perhaps easier to find problems of embedding in CV than in CE-studies.”
Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study (2007, methodology): “[32] 6 2þ sq 4=8 Fractional factorial MNL NL 267 (ERE) ð426Þ Foster and Mourato[24] 5 2þ sq Fractional factorial MNL RPL 290 (ERE) (SPEED software) Horne and Petäjistö [35] 5 2þ sq 4=8 Fractional factorial MNL 1296 (LE) ð42Þ Scarpa et al.”
Don't Think Twice, It's All Right: Music Piracy and Pricing in a DRM-Free Environment (2010, background): “…and disadvantages, along with their own set of detractors (Diamond and Hausman 1994; Hausman 1993) and supporters (Hanemann 1994), there is no consensus that any one method is clearly preferable to the other (Foster and Mourato 2003; Hanley, Mourato, and Wright 2001; Stevens et al. 2000).”
Valuing biodiversity enhancement in New Zealand's planted forests: Socioeconomic and spatial determinants of willingness-to-pay (2014, background): “This demonstrates a pattern of insensitivity to scope which has been previously identified as a potential issue in CV and in CE (Foster and Mourato, 2003; Goldberg and Roosen, 2007; Rolfe and Windle, 2010; Ryan and Wordsworth, 2000).”
Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017, background): “Multiple studies have investigated the convergent validity of estimates from these two formats (e.g., Adamowicz et al. 1998; Hanley et al. 1998; Cameron et al. 2002; Foster and Mourato 2003; Ryan 2004; Jin, Wang, and Ran 2006; Mogas, Riera, and Bennett 2006; Goldberg and Rosen 2007).”
The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments (2010, background): “The empirical research has shown that including ‘irrational responses’ may bias the point estimates and increase their variance (Johnson and Mathews, 2001; Foster and Mourato, 2003).”
Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments (2006, unknown): “Foster and Mourato (2003) found that the estimates from a choice experiment of the total value of charitable services in the UK were significantly larger than results obtained from a parallel contingent valuation survey. ii) It is more difficult for CM approaches to derive values for a sequence of…”
Valuing externalities from water supply: Status quo, choice complexity and individual random effects in panel kernel logit analysis of choice experiments (2007, methodology): “The first one refers to the description of taste variation in the observable component of utility and it is well known and often employed in the context of data analysis from choice experiments (see Layton, 2000; Garrod et al., 2002; Foster & Mourato, 2003; Scarpa et al., 2003).”