Valuing externalities from water supply: Status quo, choice complexity and individual random effects in panel kernel logit analysis of choice experiments

By Riccardo Scarpa, K. Willis, M. Acutt. 2007

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Ocean Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7577249f4a93ae28668f07e701abe37d1d68e579

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Stephane Hess
2. S. B. Olsen
3. John M. Rose
4. Riccardo Scarpa
5. N. Hanley
6. David A. Hensher
7. Jordan J. Louviere
8. Jette Bredahl Jacobsen

In Ocean Engineering

1. S. B. Olsen
2. John M. Rose
3. Jordan J. Louviere
4. Stephane Hess
5. N. Hanley
6. Riccardo Scarpa

Citations in the corpus

• Choosing Between Internet and Mail Survey Modes for Choice Experiment Surveys Considering Non-Market Goods (2009, background): “Thus, it captures any additional variance associated with the cognitive effort of evaluating experimentally designed hypothetical alternatives (Hensher and Greene 2007; Scarpa et al. 2007; Scarpa et al. 2008).”
• Should Reference Alternatives in Pivot Design SC Surveys be Treated Differently? (2009, methodology): “…as a null alternative with the attributes and attribute levels of the alternative not shown as part of the experiment (cf. Campbell et al., 2008; Scarpa et al., 2007a; Willis et al., 2005) et al. A second form of these experiments involves respondents being shown alternatives with attribute…”
• Augmenting short Cheap Talk scripts with a repeated Opt-Out Reminder in Choice Experiment surveys (2014, background): “Thus, it captures any additional variance associated with the cognitive effort of evaluating experimentally designed hypothetical alternatives (Greene and Hensher 2007; Scarpa et al. 2007; Scarpa et al. 2008).”
• Modeling preference heterogeneity in stated choice data: an analysis for public goods generated by agriculture (2009, background): “This has been recently proposed in the environmental economics literature as an interesting new approach (Scarpa et al., 2007; Termansen et al., 2004).”
• Valuing biodiversity enhancement in New Zealand's planted forests: Socioeconomic and spatial determinants of willingness-to-pay (2014, methodology): “Details about the methods for evaluating design efficiency can be found in Scarpa et al. (2007) and Scarpa and Rose (2008).”
• Attending to the Reasons for Attribute Non-attendance in Choice Experiments (2011, background): “Thus, it captures any additional variance associated with the cognitive effort of evaluating experimentally designed hypothetical alternatives (Greene and Hensher 2007; Scarpa et al. 2007; Scarpa et al. 2008).”
• Handling respondent uncertainty in Choice Experiments: Evaluating recoding approaches against explicit modelling of uncertainty (2009, background): “Thus, it captures any additional unexplained variance associated with the cognitive effort of evaluating two experimentally designed hypothetical scenarios relative to a status quo scenario (Greene and Hensher, 2007; Scarpa et al., 2007; Ferrini and Scarpa, 2007; Scarpa et al., 2008).”