Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments
By D. Pearce, G. Atkinson, S. Mourato. 2006
858 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/901f0b34a1e509b60d38f2cf1b9381b66d1eadc3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- G. Atkinson
- Philippe C. Baveye
- G. Wegner
- U. Pascual
- S. Mourato
- Jacques Baveye
- Sarah Parks
- C. Michelsen
Citations in the corpus
- Mapping ecosystem services' values: current practice and future prospects. (2013, background): “aggregation of multidimensional costs and benefits of alternative measures within a onedimensional welfare measure (Pearce et al. 2006).”
- Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services (2016, unknown): “There are various methods to estimate benefits of non-marketed goods and services in CBA (Pearce et al. 2006).”
- Measuring sustainable development (2013, unknown): “Certainly, there is a strong current of work devoted to valuation of assets by both micro- and macro-economists (Atkinson et al., 1997; Champ et al., 2003; Freeman, 1993; Pearce et al., 2006).”
- Soil “Ecosystem” Services and Natural Capital: Critical Appraisal of Research on Uncertain Ground (2016, background): “However, it is not obvious at all how human observers should go about assessing its value (Pearce et al., 2006).”
- What have economists learned about valuing nature? A review essay (2013, background): “These assumptions are arbitrary and adopted mainly for convenience (Pearce et al., 2006).”
- Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments (2011, background): “This level of ‘tolerance’ might be determined by the political process, by reference to some notional benchmark (such as an income loss indicator; see Berrens et al., 1998) or if the forgone development causes severe hardship or poverty (Pearce et al. 2006; Randall, 2007).”
- Natural Capital, Ecosystem Services, and Soil Change: Why Soil Science Must Embrace an Ecosystems Approach (2012, background): “By valuing ecosystem services in common units, usually, but not always, monetary, it is anticipated that the contribution of ecosystems, including soils, to human well-being will be recognized in societal decision making (Pearce et al., 2006).”