Determinants of board composition in New Zealand: a simultaneous equations approach

By Andrew K. Prevost, R. Rao, Mahmud Hossain. 2002

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c46bfa3a7d0357d5e16f89c8fc7ab6811bde28b3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Board Structure, Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: A Study of New Zealand Listed-Firms (2012, background): “In the New Zealand context, Chin et al. (2004), Elayan et al. (2003), Hossain et al. (2001), Prevost et al. (2002), and Reddy et al. (2008) and Reddy et al. (2010) have examined the impact of corporate governance on firm performance.”
The Diversity of Corporate Board Committees and Financial Performance (2008, background): “15 For example, see Yermack (1996), Prevost, Rao, and Hossain (2002), and Faleye (2007).”
Impact of board size and board diversity on firm value: Australian evidence (2007, unknown): “According to Prevost et al (2002), the mean number of directors for a sample of firms listed on the New Zealand Stock Exchange is 6.6 with a min of 2 and a max of 14.”
Committee Independence and Financial Institution Performance During the 2007–08 Credit Crunch: Evidence from a Multi‐Country Study (2011, background): “Agrawal and Knoeber 1996; Beatty and Zajac 1994; Bhagat and Black 2002; Chhaochharia and Grinstein 2007; Dalton et al. 1998; Hermalin and Weisbach 2003; Klein 1998; Laing and Weir 1999; Prevost, Rao, and Hossain 2002; Vafeas and Theodorou 1998; Yermack 1996.”
Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Africa: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis (2008, background): “In spite of the generally accepted notion that effective corporate governance enhances firm performance, other studies have reported negative relationship between corporate governance and firm performance (Bathala and Rao, 1995; Hutchinson, 2002) or have not found any relationship (Park and Shin, 20”
Corporate Governance, Corporate Ownership, and the Role of Institutional Investors: A Global Perspective (2003, unknown): “As noted earlier, the agency problems between managers and shareholders as envisioned by Berle and Means (1932) and Roe (1990) might not be prevalent in economies where ownership structures differ. Indeed, LaPorta, Lopez-de-Silanes, and Shleifer (1999) conclude that in many economies the primary age”