Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Africa: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Impact of board characteristics on Firm Performance: Evidence from Nonfinancial Listed Companies in Kuwaiti Stock Exchange (2012, background): “This 2012, Vol. 2, No. 2 www.macrothink.org/ijafr 326 finding is similar to that found by Mallin (2007) among the U.S. companies and Kyereboah-Coleman (2007) and Kajol & Sunday (2008) among Nigerian companies.”
Audit Committee, Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from India (2016, background): “…that lesser number of audit committee meetings improved financial performance of the firm as it reduced the additional cost that was incurred with every meeting, but Kyereboah-Coleman (2008) established favorable outcome of frequent audit committee meetings on market measures of firm performance.”
Corporate governance and dividend pay-out policy in UK listed SMEs: The effects of corporate board characteristics (2017, unknown): “A number of past studies (Al-Swidi et al., 2012; Kajol & Sunday, 2008; Kyereboah-Coleman, 2008) report empirical evidence that audit committee size impacts positively on firm performance.”
Board Characteristics and Firm Performance: Case of Saudi Arabia (2012, methodology): “Furthermore, Kyereboah-Coleman (2007) finds that AC size has a positive relationship with the effectiveness to monitor misreporting.”