The End of Diversity?: Prospects for German and Japanese Capitalism

By K. Yamamura, W. Streeck. 2003

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c3c3016722d67f4ce17459bce98ec0a6f93bb046

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Politics of Common Knowledge: Ideas and Institutional Change in Wage Bargaining (2008, background): “…export sectors—that had roots in both domestic institutions 99+ Pérez 2000+ 100+ Hardiman 2002, 7+ 101+ See Hall and Soskice 2001; Amable 2003; and Yamamura and Streeck 2003+ and changing international market conditions+ These crises were real and apparent to major actors in both countries—not,…”
Vertical Disintegration and the Disorganisation of German Industrial Relations (2007, unknown): “…strong, coordinated collective bargaining and a remarkably robust trade union movement (Turner 1991; Thelen 1991; Hall and Soskice 2001); and has more recently become a key test case for analyzing the stability or erosion of these institutions (Yamamura and Streeck 2003; Paterson and Green 2005).”
Continuity and Change in Corporate Governance: Comparing Germany and Japan (2005, unknown): “Only recently has a small but growing literature tried directly to compare the similarities and differences between “deviant” models such as Germany and Japan (Dore, 1996, 2000; Streeck and Yamamura, 2001; Yamamura and Streeck, 2003) or differentiate among East Asian, Latin and other European models”
From comparing capitalisms to the politics of institutional change (2008, background): “The CC literature largely rejects the convergence hypothesis that national varieties of capitalism will move toward a single model (Jacoby, 2004; Vogel, 2006; Yamamura and Streeck, 2003).”
Culture, meaning, and institutions: Executive rationale in Germany and Japan (2009, unknown): “Among the CMEs, these countries stand out as the two largest and arguably most important economies as well as a prominent pairing in academic research on the contrasts between CMEs and LMEs (e.g., Dore, 2000; Streeck and Yamamura, 2001; Yamamura and Streeck, 2003; Lewin and Kim, 2004; Witt, 2006).”
Asian Business Systems: Institutional Comparison, Clusters, and Implications for Varieties of Capitalism and Business Systems Theory (2013, unknown): “…of other advanced industrialized economies (e.g., Berger and Dore, 1996; Dore, 2000; Streeck and Yamamura, 2001) and how it evolves over time (e.g., Dore, 2000; Yamamura and Streeck, 2003; Anchordoguy, 2005; Vogel, 2006; Westney, 2006; Witt, 2006; Aoki et al. , 2007; Lechevalier, 2007; Sako, 2008).”
Varieties of Capitalism and institutional comparative advantage: A test and reinterpretation (2016, background): “…this changes over time: the parsimony of Varieties of Capitalism may overlook substantial institutional variety within the LME and CME categories (Yamamura & Streeck, 2003), emerging and transition economies cannot be understood using this approach (Nölke & Vliegenthart, 2009; Redding & Witt,…”
The Globalization of Service Work: Comparative Institutional Perspectives on Call Centers (2009, background): “…has undergone consider able fragmentation in recent decades, with declines in bargaining coverage, union density, and employer compliance with in dustry agreements (Yamamura and Streeck 2003; Patterson and Green 2005; Bosch and Weinkopf 2008; Caroli and Gautie 2008; Westergaard-Nielsen 2008).”