Continuity and Change in Corporate Governance: Comparing Germany and Japan

By Gregory Jackson, A. Moerke. 2005

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/63cf7b692742c8d05dcb57a39b0c24572fed45ee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Strengthening the Financial Reporting System: Can Audit Committees Deliver? (2010, unknown): “Remarkably, corporate governance reforms around the world are often informed by the principles underlying the US model of corporate governance (Jackson and Moerke, 2005).”
Comparative and International Corporate Governance (2010, methodology): “For example, the U.S. system is designed around the normative notion of shareholder value, whereas the Japanese model reflects a greater commitment to employee welfare (Jackson, 2005; Jackson & Moerke, 2005).”
Audit Committee, Underpricing of IPOs, and Accuracy of Management Earnings Forecasts (2008, unknown): “the US model of corporate governance ( Jackson and Moerke 2005 ).”
Convergence of Corporate Governance: Critical Review and Future Directions (2009, unknown): “The writing on convergence often seems to assume that governance systems are divided into two distinct categories – the “market based” US system and the “relationship-oriented” or “stakeholder-based” models found in such countries as Germany and Japan (Kaplan, 1997; Jackson and Moerke, 2005 ).”
Family Control and Ownership Monitoring in Family-Controlled Firms in Japan (2010, unknown): “Since these foreign investors have only arm’s-length relationships with firms in which they invest, they seek higher investment returns ( Jackson and Moerke, 2005).”
Institutional Antecedents of Corporate Governance Legitimacy (2008, background): “Japanese boards of directors have traditionally been occupied completely by inside directors, and CEOs almost always serve a dual role as they chair their boards (Jackson & Moerke, 2005).”
How do corporate governance model differences affect foreign direct investment in emerging economies? (2009, background): “The practice of insider domination has been found to be quite resistant o US influence (Jackson & Moerke, 2005).”