Interfirm Strategic Information Flows in Logistics Supply Chain Relationships
By Richard Klein, Arun Rai. MIS Q., 2009
463 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ee72f5b9f2eb0a3041f0726f71aa97ac262efc2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
- Jörg Henseler
- Marko Sarstedt
- Christian M. Ringle
- Paul A. Pavlou
- Omar El Sawy
- Bingchao Pan
- Fujun Lai
- Yaping Song
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Christian M. Ringle
- Marko Sarstedt
- Jörg Henseler
- Joseph F. Hair
- Genshu Lu
- Bingchao Pan
- Yaping Song
- Florian Schuberth
Citations in the corpus
- Using Partial Least Squares in Operations Management Research: A Practical Guideline and Summary of Past Research (2012, methodology): “…item-to-ownconstruct-correlations with item-to-otherconstruct-correlationsa (Klein and Rai, 2009) Format correla compo to a gre with th of othe a This method was recently proposed in the literature (Klein and Rai, 2009) and is not a 2009) do not provide detailed guidance on how to apply this test.”
- A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling (2015, background): “One of the few exceptions is the research by Klein and Rai (2009), who suggest examining the crossloadings of formative indicators.”
- Digital Business Strategy: Toward a Next Generation of Insights (2013, background): “This, coupled with outsourcing of non-core activities to a network of partners, has allowed companies to optimize their supply chains in extended interfirm networks and enhance efficiency (e.g., Klein and Rai 2009; Rai et al. 2012; Saraf et al. 2007).”
- How University Entrepreneurship Support Affects College Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions: An Empirical Analysis from China (2021, methodology): “Third, to evaluate the formative construct’s discriminant validity, we computed and compared the item-to-item, construct-to-construct, item-to-its formative construct, and item-to-other constructs correlations [115].”