Seeing What's Next: Using the Theories of Innovation to Predict Industry Change
By Clayton M. Christensen, S. Anthony, Erik A. Roth. 2005
639 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c3a92269a7ee38370d38ac0d185f487d69a1d467
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- R. M. Walker
- Christian Berggren
- Anna Bergek
- Zheng Xiang
- Lee B. Erickson
- Eileen M. Trauth
- Irene J. Petrick
- M. Hobday
Citations in the corpus
- Rationales and mechanisms for revitalizing US manufacturing R&D strategies (2010, background): “The tier in a supply chain at which this vertical disintegration occurs has been labeled the ''decoupling point'' (Christensen et al. 2004b).”
- Forming and Exploiting Opportunities: The Implications of Discovery and Creation Processes for Entrepreneurial and Organizational Research (2013, background): “…tied to prior industries, institutions, or markets may make it difficult to engage in an opportunity enactment process (Aldrich and Kenworthy 1999, Christensen et al. 2004, DiMaggio 1991, Ingram and Baum 1997, March 1991, March and Simon 1958, Mosakowski 1997, Repenning and Sterman 2002, Simon…”
- Representation of the Online Tourism Domain in Search Engines (2008, background): “These changes may, in turn, lead to more intense competition and re-shuffling of the industry structure (Christensen and Anthony 2004).”
- - in-Progress (2012, positive): “As such, organizational culture directly affects whether innovation is encouraged within an organization, the amount of innovation that is generated (Martins and Terblanche, 2003), and the strategic decisions senior management makes (Christensen et. al., 2004).”
- Disruptive Innovation: An Intellectual History and Directions for Future Research (2018, result): “Outcomes later observed were consistent with predictions in four of the six industries (see Christensen et al., 2004).”
- Lessons from 60 years of pharmaceutical innovation (2009, background): “Their experiences show that industries can survive such upheavals; someone always finds a way to redesign the business model, but that someone, ominously, has seldom been an incumben”
- The Fit between Technological Innovation and Business Model Design for Firm Growth: Evidence from China (2014, neutral): “Firms often lose their position of industry leadership because they listen too carefully to their current customers (Christensen et al., 2004).”
- Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational Performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations (2009, background): “The study of innovation hardly needs justification as scholars, policy makers, business executives, and public administrators maintain that innovation is a primary source of economic growth, industrial change, competitive advantage, and public service (Borins, 1998; Boyne et al., 2006; Christensen e”
- An expanded and strategic view of discontinuous innovations: deploying a service-dominant logic (2008, background): “This implication refers to the “conservation of integration” (Christensen et al. 2004, p. 19), which holds that a given value creation activity requires a certain amount of integration, such that the customer, as a co-creator of value, can integrate more or fewer resources as necessary.”
- Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: destruction, disruption or creative accumulation? (2013, background): “This is a pattern of change that " can occur in any product or service market " (Christensen et al., 2004, p. 270).”