Measuring plagiarism: researching what students do, not what they say they do

241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university students (2019, background): “Third, as Walker (2010) has previously noted, there are potential limitations of self-reporting of behaviour, particularly dishonest behaviour.”
Chinese University Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism (2015, background): “…by these students to obtain good academic results so that they could go to good graduate schools at home, further their education at reputable overseas universities, or land themselves a good job in the highly competitive employment market (D. Li, 2007; Mu & Xu, 2009; Sapp, 2002; Walker, 2010).”
Reducing plagiarism through academic misconduct education (2020, background): “Despite the professed increased propensity of non-native English speaking ‘International’ students to commit plagiarism (Walker 2010), the low levels of plagiarism indicated in the set of submissions (even though almost all submitting students are NNES) indicates that this suggestion is not…”
‘Teach us how to do it properly!’ An Australian academic integrity student survey (2014, background): “(2) The potential limitations of self-reporting of behaviour, particularly dishonest behaviour (Walker 2010), are acknowledged.”