‘Teach us how to do it properly!’ An Australian academic integrity student survey

By Tracey Bretag, Saadia Mahmud, M. Wallace, R. Walker, U. McGowan, J. East, Margaret Green, L. Partridge, C. James. 2014

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/63a3ed16fe68480dac1dc154fa1a0d34d9bc094f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. P. Newton

In Safety Research

1. Rowena Harper
2. K. van Haeringen
3. Cath Ellis
4. Pearl Rozenberg
5. P. Newton
6. Tracey Bretag
7. S. Saddiqui

Citations in the corpus

• Does authentic assessment assure academic integrity? Evidence from contract cheating data (2020, background): “…(Beasley, 2014; Rettinger & Kramer, 2009), lack of motivation or engagement, norms of sharing, and mental health (Blum, 2016), poor time management, personal values/attitudes, lack of deterrence (Park, 2003) and misunderstandings (Bretag et al., 2014; Glendinning, 2014; Gullifer & Tyson, 2010).”