The Missing Link between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Stakeholder Salience and Identification

By J. Peloza, Lisa Papania. 2008

224 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c37ab4bebfbf6081fc7940b794c3c725942db037

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

1. Eduardo Ortas
2. Ingo Kleindienst
3. Elena Lvina
4. Sylvia Grewatsch
5. Carol-Ann Tetrault Sirsly
6. J. Peloza
7. Caroline Flammer

In Marketing

1. Ingo Kleindienst
2. Sylvia Grewatsch
3. Eduardo Ortas
4. Carol-Ann Tetrault Sirsly
5. Elena Lvina
6. M. J. Bonilla-Priego
7. Jose M. Moneva
8. J. Peloza

In Strategy and Management

1. Ingo Kleindienst
2. Sylvia Grewatsch
3. Carol-Ann Tetrault Sirsly
4. Eduardo Ortas
5. Elena Lvina
6. M. J. Bonilla-Priego
7. Jose M. Moneva
8. J. Peloza

Citations in the corpus

• Corporate social responsibility and organisational performance in the tourism sector (2019, background): “Otherwise, when stakeholders are indifferent towards CSR actions, CFP improvement can only be driven by cost savings (Peloza & Papania, 2008).”
• When Does It Pay to be Good? Moderators and Mediators in the Corporate Sustainability–Corporate Financial Performance Relationship: A Critical Review (2017, background): “After all, in order to praise or criticize a firm’s CS activities, stakeholders must first notice, interpret, and finally act on the provided information of the firm’s CS activities (Daft and Weick 1984; Peloza and Papania 2008).”
• The concept of environmental performance and its measurement in empirical studies (2011, unknown): “Environmental responsibility follows this multi-stakeholder perspective (Wood 1991; Atkinson et al. 1997; Peloza and Papania 2008).”
• Corporate Social Responsibility: A Corporate Marketing Perspective (2011, unknown): “Interestingly, these notions (see Bhattacharya and Sen, 2003 for the full model, particularly for the consequences of identification in the consumer domain) have received significant empirical support in recent years (Currás-Pérez, 2009; Lichtenstein et al., 2004; Podnar and Golob, 2007; Peloza and ”
• From Doing Good to Looking Even Better: The Dynamics of CSR and Reputation (2019, background): “…the firm’s stakeholder orientation (Phillips, Berman, Elms, & Johnson-Cramer, 2011), while stakeholders with power, legitimacy, and urgency (Mitchell, Agle, & Wood, 1997) are likely to not only be more salient to managers, but to also follow and be more aware of CSR (Peloza & Papania, 2008).”
• The causality direction of the corporate social responsibility – Corporate financial performance Nexus: Application of Panel Vector Autoregression approach (2019, unknown): “There are numerous other definitions that were used by studies that investigated the effect of CSR on economic performance (Pava and Krausz, 1996; Peloza and Papania, 2008; Nelling and Webb, 2009; Surroca, Tribó, & Waddock, 2010).”
• The Challenge of Measuring Financial Impacts From Investments in Corporate Social Performance (2009, background): “Peloza and Papania (2008) argue that assessing the business case for CSP inevitably requires firms to review how they identify and evaluate their stakeholders.”