Treatment integrity assessment in the schools: An evaluation of the Treatment Integrity Planning Protocol.
By Lisa M. Hagermoser Sanetti, Thomas Kratochwill. 2009
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c33fcc82c63c4d28b02775c90564b9f1cf5f5e79
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Treatment Integrity in Behavioral Consultation: Measurement, Promotion, and Outcomes (2007, background): “…evaluations are variable with some indicating a direct correlation between treatment integrity and outcomes (e.g., DiGennaro et al., 2005, 2007; Noell et al., 2000; Witt et al., 1997) and others finding an inconsistent relationship (e.g., Hagermoser Sanetti & Kratochwill, 2007; Noell et al., 1997).”
- Toward Developing a Science of Treatment Integrity: Introduction to the Special Series (2009, unknown): “Results of more recent research, how ever, indicate that teachers were accurate when they self-reported implementation on a daily basis (see Hagermoser Sanetti & Kratochwill, 2009) and self-report measures with adequate psychometric properties may be sensitive to implementation when adminis tered…”
- Fidelity Measurement in Consultation: Psychometric Issues and Preliminary Examination (2009, unknown): “Methods for collecting data to accu rately assess implementation fidelity are emerging (Klute, Moreno, Sciarrino, & Anderson, 2008; Sanetti & Kratochwill, 2009; Trivette & Swanson, 2008; Zvoch et al., 2007).”