Corporate Citizenship: A Stakeholder Approach for Defining Corporate Social Performance and Identifying Measures for Assessing It

By K. Davenport. 2000

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c330e1ac184bd7fe6ca63ba2fd95083e5b7316ae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

1. Dima Jamali
2. T. Keshishian
3. M. Zanhour
4. E. Elijido-Ten
5. Dirk Matten
6. J. Moon
7. Juelin Yin

In Marketing

1. T. Keshishian
2. M. Zanhour
3. E. Elijido-Ten
4. K. Bondy
5. Dirk Matten
6. J. Moon
7. Dima Jamali
8. Juelin Yin

In Strategy and Management

1. Dima Jamali
2. J. Moon
3. T. Keshishian
4. Dirk Matten
5. M. Zanhour
6. E. Elijido-Ten
7. K. Bondy
8. Juelin Yin

Citations in the corpus

• An Institution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Multi-National Corporations (MNCs): Form and Implications (2012, background): “…for CSR is questionable given the differences in time horizons of financial and CSR data, and the difficulties involved in identifying social and environmental impacts, creating mitigation activities and measuring performance (e.g. Global Reporting Initiative, 1999; Davenport, 2000; Gray, 2001).”
• Applying stakeholder theory to analyze corporate environmental performance: Evidence from Australian listed companies (2007, background): “Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is one area in which stakeholder theory has been commonly applied (Ullmann 1985; Roberts 1992; Clarkson 1995; Davenport 2000) because the changing nature of the business environment created a demand for firms to acknowledge their responsibility to a broader…”
• Peculiar Strengths and Relational Attributes of SMEs in the Context of CSR (2009, background): “…the richness of theoretical frameworks on offer and the significant progress that has been made in the relatively novice field of CSR, a field that has invariably been criticized as plagued with theoretical void and abstraction (e.g., Davenport, 2000; DeFillipi, 1982; Doh and Guay, 2006).”