Regional Economic Integration

By R. Gibb. 2017

326 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Law, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c27f66c2c34b643905bed9646c25f05f62fd5978

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Thomas Sampson
2. Gianmarco I. P. Ottaviano
3. John Van Reenen
4. Swati Dhingra
5. Edward D. Mansfield
6. Jon C. W. Pevehouse
7. Richard E. Baldwin
8. Rajneesh Narula

In Law

1. A. Panagariya
2. David J. Donaldson
3. G. Liang
4. Edward D. Mansfield
5. Alain Verbeke
6. Richard E. Baldwin
7. Rodrigo Adão
8. Arnaud Costinot

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Jon C. W. Pevehouse
2. Richard E. Baldwin
3. Helen V. Milner
4. Edward D. Mansfield
5. Gabriel R. G. Benito
6. Alain Verbeke
7. A. Panagariya
8. Thomas Sampson

Citations in the corpus

• Foreign Direct Investment and Regional Trade Agreements: The Market Size Effect Revisited (2004, unknown): “For a discussion of the benefits and costs of RTAs, see for example De la Torre and Kelly (1992), and Baldwin and Venables (1995).”
• How Confident Can We Be in CGE-Based Assessments of Free Trade Agreements? (2003, unknown): “Although these two averages are fairly similar, there is much greater sectoral variation in the econometrically estimated elasticities.”
• Nonparametric Counterfactual Predictions in Neoclassical Models of International Trade (2017, methodology): “…an important application of CGE models has been the analysis of regional trade agreements, such as NAFTA and the European Union, in which the counterfactual shocks of interest were not productivity shocks but rather changes in trade policy: see, e.g., Baldwin and Venables (1995) for a survey.”
• Regulatory Protectionism, Developing Nations, and a Two-Tier World Trade System (2000, background): “Only one of such implications is exposed here; see Baldwin and Venables (1995) for more on the economics of preferential liberalisation.”
• Borders and Growth (2005, unknown): “6 For a survey of the regional-integration literature, see Baldwin and Venables (1995).”
• Environmental influences on MNE subsidiary roles: economic integration and the Nordic countries (2003, background): “Although the positive trade effects of integration are transparent (Baldwin and Venables, 1995, Pain and Lansbury 1997) the evidence on FDI effects is somewhat more ambiguous (Neven and Siotis, 1993; Yannopulos, 1990).”
• The theory and practice of regional strategy: a response to Osegowitsch and Sammartino (2008, background): “This does not necessarily imply the demise of the country manager, but it signals the relevance of the regional level in scholarly reflection on MNE strategy and structure (Fratianni, 2006; Rugman, 2007; Rugman & Verbeke, 2005).”
• Does the East Get What Would Otherwise Flow to the South? FDI Diversion in Europe (2001, unknown): “_______________ 2 These ideas are also set out in Haaland and Wooton (1992), and Baldwin and Venables (1995).”
• Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA (2012, unknown): “Given π j′ ni (ŵ), τ ′, γn, γ j,k n and α j n, solve for total expenditure in each sector j and country n, Xj′ n (ŵ) consistent with the vector of wages ŵ using (14) .”
• Preferential Trade Liberalization: The Traditional Theory and New Developments (2000, background): “2Survey articles include Baldwin and Venables (1995), Bhagwati and Panagariya (1996a, 1996b), Bhagwati, Greenaway and Panagariya (1998), Panagariya (1998a) and Winters (1996).”
• Democracy, Veto Players and the Depth of Regional Integration (2008, background): “2 An extensive literature exists on the economic consequences of integration arrangements (e.g. Lipsey, 1960; de Melo and Panagariya, 1993; Baldwin and Venables, 1995; Bhagwati and Panagariya, 1996; Krueger, 1997; Krishna et al., 1999; Freund, 2000; Panagariya, 2000; Venables, 2003; Lloyd and…”