Preferential Trade Liberalization: The Traditional Theory and New Developments

By A. Panagariya. 2000

534 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30b75a9f159dbd6e2366729d4bb8c5f0eedd8894

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Democracy, Veto Players and the Depth of Regional Integration (2008, background): “sequence, as Panagariya and Findlay (1996) and Richardson (1994) have shown,”
The Political Economy of Trade Policy: Empirical Approaches (2005, unknown): “Bhagwati (1993) and Panagariya (2000) provide excellent surveys.”
Trade Blocks and the Gravity Model: A Study of Economic Integration among Asian Developing Countries (2010, background): “For a more detailed literature review, the reader is directed to any of a number of surveys of various approaches to the study of RTAs, including Panagariya (1999, 2000), DeRosa (1998), Harrison, Rutherford and Tarr (2003), Robinson and Thierfelder (2002), Scollay and Gilbert (2000), and Lloyd and…”
Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements (2002, background): “See Anderson and Blackhurst 1993; Bhagwati 1993; de Melo and Panagariya 1993; Fernández and Portes 1998; Krueger 1999; Pomfret 1988; Panagariya 2000; and Whalley 1998.”
On necessarily welfare-enhancing free trade areas (2002, background): “2 A singular exception is the well-known result relating to customs unions (CUs) , stated independently by Kemp (1964) and Vanek (1965) and proved subsequently by Ohyama (1972) and Kemp and Wan (1976), that if two or more countries freeze their net external trade vector with the rest of the world th”
Trade Diverion and Declinning Tariffs: Evidence from MERCOSUR (2003, background): “The political economy model of Panagariya and Findlay (1996) demonstrates how lobbying becomes cheaper under an FTA, with the result that inter-bloc tariffs will rise.”
Winners and losers from regional integration agreements (2003, unknown): “Demands are derived from utility maximisation, and income is given by 22 1 Two recent surveys are Baldwin and Venables (1995) and Panagariya (2000).”
Preference Erosion and Multilateral Trade Liberalization (2005, background): “preferential exporters, costs imposed on third-country exporters, and potential losses for the importer as well (Panagariya, 2000).”
Effects of Regional Trade Agreements on Trade in Agrifood Products: Evidence from Gravity Modeling Using Disaggregated Data (2008, background): “multilateral trading system ( Panagariya 2000; Krueger 1999).”
New measures of trade creation and trade diversion (2008, background): “Empirical work estimating these effects is particularly important since theoretical work suggests that regional agreements may be beneficial or harmful depending on the particular countries involved and the extent of trade creation relative to trade diversion (see Panagariya, 2000 for a survey).”
How Desirable is the South Asian Free Trade Area? A Quantitative Economic Assessment (2003, background): “The proliferation of preferential trading agreements (PTAs) in different regions of the world has been a significant development over the last two decades (see Panagariya, 2000 for a detailed survey on the theoretical work).”