Coexistence of competing parasitoids on a patchily distributed host: local vs. spatial mechanisms

By P. Amarasekare. 2000

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1b99b5691ab9f33ca30b39c3e63f998fabe761b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Testing intraguild predation theory in a field system: does numerical dominance shift along a gradient of productivity? (2003, background): “However, four notable exceptions exist (Morin 1999; Amarasekare 2000; Diehl & Feissel 2000, 2001).”
Intraguild predation: a widespread interaction related to species biology (2004, background): “In spite of these theoretical developments, empirical evidence for the effects of IGP on species coexistence and dynamics are mainly limited to microcosm experiments and parasitoid systems (Morin & Lawler 1996; Morin 1999; Amarasekare 2000; Borer et al. 2003).”
Trade‐offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence (2004, background): “Most studies do not find the competitive/dispersal ability trade-off, but instead find species’ differences in habitat use (Marino 1991a,b; Harrison et al. 1995; Turnbull et al. 1999; Amarasekare 2000; Marshall et al. 2000; Yu et al. 2001).”
Colonization rates and distances of a host butterfly and two specific parasitoids in a fragmented landscape (2002, unknown): “However, asymmetric dispersal capacity is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for host–parasitoid coexistence in a fragmented landscape (Slatkin 1974; Taylor 1988; Harrison & Taylor 1997; Nee et al. 1997; Amarasekare 2000).”
Effects of habitat fragmentation at different trophic levels in insect communities (2005, background): “Similarly, the temporal scale should be presented in terms of the generation times of the species involved (for a good example see Amarasekare 2000a, 2000b).”
SPATIAL HABITAT HETEROGENEITY INFLUENCES COMPETITION AND COEXISTENCE IN AN AFRICAN ACACIA ANT GUILD (2003, background): “…to exploit rich vs. poor resource conditions have been reported for a variety of taxa (algae, Sommer 1989; invertebrates, Kohler 1992, Schmitt 1996, Amarasekare 2000, Tessier et al. 2000; vertebrates, Brown et al. 1994), and may play an important role in supporting species coexistence in mosaic…”