Intraguild predation: a widespread interaction related to species biology

By M. Arim, Pablo A. Marquet. 2004

521 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db6f79868fe9059ca1783b882f21b176b873c743

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Trophic supplements to intraguild predation (2007, background): “A recent analysis of more than 100 documented food webs suggests IGP is frequentoccurring in up to 60% or more of all trophic groupings (Arim and Marquet 2004).”
The Influence of Intraguild Predation on the Suppression of a Shared Prey Population: An Empirical Reassessment (2006, background): “that has a diet broad enough to include a herbivore and another predator is very likely to consume multiple species of herbivore prey, and often plant-based resources as well ( Arim and Marquet 2004 ).”
On the relationship between trophic position, body mass and temperature: reformulating the energy limitation hypothesis (2007, background): “…and few discrete trophic levels, where individuals present large variations in body size and, consequently, in energetic demands, and with attributes that vary according to habitat and predator and prey types (Cohen et al. 2003, Arim and Marquet 2004, Arim and Jaksic 2005, Brose et al. 2006b).”
Intraguild predation in raptor assemblages: A review (2008, background): “…have proliferated and the phenomenon has been demonstrated, both empirically and experimentally, to be a fundamental determinant of the structure of predator assemblages of invertebrates, fish and mammalian carnivores (reviewed by Polis & Holt 1992, Palomares & Caro 1999, Arim & Marquet 2004).”
OMNIVORY CREATES CHAOS IN SIMPLE FOOD WEB MODELS (2005, background): “However, they considered a simple linear food chain and neglected omnivory, whereas numerous empirical studies have shown that onmivory is widespread in food webs (Polis et al. 1989, Winemiller 1990, Polis 1991, 1994, Diehl 1993, Coll and Guershon 2002, Denno and Fagan 2003, Arim and Marquet 2004).”
SIMPLE TROPHIC MODULES FOR COMPLEX FOOD WEBS (2005, background): “The overrepresentation of intraguild predation in real food webs found here (except when using the nested-hierarchy 2)(see also Arim and Marquet 2004) suggests that this dynamic complexity may be common in real communities.”
Diversity in a complex ecological network with two interaction types (2009, background): “Studies involving predation and competition (Chase et al. 2002, Arim and Marquet 2004 ) and mutualism and antagonistic interactions (Go ´mez 1996, Armbruster et al. 1997, Strauss 1997, Herrera 2000, Strauss and Irwin 2004) have shown that the combination of different interaction types is not random”
Stability and persistence of food webs with omnivory: Is there a general pattern? (2012, background): “Because it is analytically tractable, widespread in natural food webs (Rosenheim et al. 1995, Arim and Marquet 2004), and directly comparable to competition and predation modules that lack an omnivorous link, the IGP module has been a focal point of research on omnivory.”
Evidence for the existence of a robust pattern of prey selection in food webs (2007, background): “Studies have also investigated a subset of motifs or modules in food webs (Milo et al. 2002; Arim & Marquet 2004; Bascompte & Melián 2005).”
Implications of intraguild predation for sea turtle nest protection (2008, background): “Intraguild predation, in which one resource competitor preys on another, is widespread in ecological communities (Polis and Holt, 1992; Arim and Marquet, 2004) and can strongly affect community structure and composition (Palomares et al., 1995; Stapp, 1997; Fedriani et al., 2000).”
Complex interactions in the microbial world: underexplored key links between viruses, bacteria and protozoan grazers in aquatic environments (2008, background): “In other words, bacteria, viruses and HNF constitute an IGP ‘module’ (Arim & Marquet 2004), a situation that is widespread in both terrestrial and aquatic food webs.”
Analysis of three species Lotka-Volterra food web models with omnivory (2015, unknown): “Finally, we would like to discuss a longstanding debate in ecology [14]: Does omnivory destabilize [19,18] or stabilize [16,28,20,3,22,26,1] the food web system? Based on our analytical and simulation results, we try to answer this question by transferring it to the following: How does the omnivorou”
The profile of a 'perfect' invader - the case of killer shrimp, Dikerogammarus villosus (2014, background): “…(Polis et al. 1989), despite being considered an unstable phenomenon (e.g. Holt and Polis 1997), is a widespread interaction in natural food webs (Arim and Marquet 2004) and is increasingly acknowledged as a major driver of rapid species exclusions during biological invasions (e.g. Snyder et al.…”
The Rise of the Mesopredator (2009, background): “The occurrence of intraguild predation in food webs is the norm rather than the exception (Arim and Marquet 2004), and the unique dynamics that result from the interplay between competition and predation have sparked a rich body of theory over the past decade (e.g., Holt and Polis 1997, Holt and…”
Human Involvement in Food Webs (2010, background): “Intraguild predation is common (119) and affects many food webs in which humans are involved.”
Can warm climate‐related structure of littoral predator assemblies weaken the clear water state in shallow lakes? (2007, background): “The trophic groups were classified as plants (periphyton, phytoplankton), intermediate herbivores (i herb, Clad: cladocerans, Inv: invertebrates), intermediate carnivores (i car, Inv: invertebrates, P: pelagic, L: littoral), intermediate omnivores (i omn), and top carnivores (t car: piscivorous fish”