Colonization rates and distances of a host butterfly and two specific parasitoids in a fragmented landscape

By S. V. Nouhuys, Ilkka Hanski. 2002

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c60e63086f86d01eb5403ca10c2c1652e219e4ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Josef Settele
2. T. Tscharntke
3. R. Brandl
4. O. Lewis
5. Van Nouhuys
6. M. Shaw
7. A. Biere
8. J. Dover

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Josef Settele
2. Van Nouhuys
3. M. Shaw
4. J. Dover
5. Guangchun Lei
6. O. Lewis
7. R. Brandl
8. C. Jeffs

In Plant Science

1. Josef Settele
2. T. Tscharntke
3. R. Brandl
4. Guangchun Lei
5. A. Biere
6. Van Nouhuys
7. M. Shaw
8. J. Dover

Citations in the corpus

• Parasitoid–host metapopulation dynamics: the causes and consequences of phenological asynchrony (2004, methodology): “Seventy colonizations between spring 1994 and spring 2002 were included in the data set (for details of the data set used see van Nouhuys & Hanski 2002a).”
• Plant-insect interactions in fragmented landscapes. (2004, background): “Although most theoretical and empirical studies found that phytophagous hosts are better dispersers than their specific parasitoids (66, 74, 90–92, 158), dispersal of the Glanville fritillary butterfly, Melitaea cinxia, is intermediate between that of its two primary parasitoids (162, 163).”
• Effects of habitat fragmentation at different trophic levels in insect communities (2005, background): “In contrast, some of the most convincing demonstrations of a lack of fragmentation effects emerge from studies of individual species — even when they were studied on a relatively large spatial scale (such as van Nouhuys & Hanski 2002, discussed below).”
• Habitat Considerations for Parasitic Wasps (Hymenoptera) (2006, background): “Interestingly, even specialist parasitoids of a particular host can differ substantially in their dispersal characteristics, as is shown by two koinobiont larval parasitoids of the nymphalid butterfly Melitaea cinxia (Linnaeus) ( van Nouhuys and Hanski 2002; Kankare et al. 2005).”
• Distribution and colonisation ability of three parasitoids and their herbivorous host in a fragmented landscape (2007, methodology): “Also, Van Nouhuys and Hanski (2002) show that the largest of two parasitoid species has a better dispersal ability and Roland and Taylor (1997) show that the spatial scale at which parasitism rate responds to forest structure is positively correlated with the relative body size of four tachinid…”
• Ecological and Evolutionary Consequences of Biological Invasion and Habitat Fragmentation (2005, background): “Van Nouhuys and Hanski (2002a) provide an interesting example of two insect parasitoids that attack the same host, but differ significantly in their dispersal abilities.”
• The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review (2009, background): “Despite some advantages, such as protection from competing invading species (King, 1984) and parasitoids (van Nouhuys and Hanski 2002), the isolation of habitat patches generally increases the risk of extinction due to catastrophes or other negative impacts, including inbreeding depression…”
• Effects of climate warming on host–parasitoid interactions (2013, background): “…be dispersed passively over very long distances (Ahmed et al ., 2009), dispersal ability is typically correlated positively with body size in insects (Roff, 1991), including parasitoids (Roland, 1993; Lei & Hanski, 1998; van Nouhuys & Hanski, 2002; Elzinga et al ., 2007; Schönrogge et al ., 2012).”