Trade‐offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence
By Jamie M. Kneitel, Jonathan M. Chase. 2004
823 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51eee35bbcbf4d55c35e5f2f361f8cca118a980b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Jonathan M. Chase
- N. Mouquet
- Michel Loreau
- D. Ning
- David Tilman
- Jizhong Zhou
- M. Leibold
- Jonathan B. Shurin
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Jonathan M. Chase
- N. Mouquet
- Michel Loreau
- Jamie M. Kneitel
- B. Gilbert
- David Tilman
- Andrew Gonzalez
- T. Fukami
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Jonathan M. Chase
- Charles D. Canham
- N. Mouquet
- Michel Loreau
- M. Leibold
- David Tilman
- Jamie M. Kneitel
- B. Gilbert
Citations in the corpus
- Trait-Based Community Ecology of Phytoplankton (2008, background): “This trade-off can explain species replacements along nutrient gradients as well as the coexistence of two species at equilibrium (Leibold 1996), contributing to species diversity (Kneitel & Chase 2004).”
- Which plant traits predict species loss in calcareous grasslands with extinction debt? (2012, background): “In addition, the trade-off between competitive and dispersal ability can increase the likeliness of extinction of good dispersers in low-quality habitats (Kneitel & Chase, 2004).”
- Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence (2005, background): “Perhaps the most significant conceptual spinoff of resource-based theory, however, was broader recognition of the fundamental importance of physiological and life history trade-offs (e.g. Tilman 1982, 1988; Kneitel & Chase 2004).”
- Above‐ versus below‐ground competitive effects and responses of a guild of temperate tree species (2009, background): “Both heterogeneity and species trade-offs are important for species coexistence through niche differentiation (Chesson 2000; Kneitel & Chase 2004 ), although coexistence can also be promoted by species-specific responses to a spatially or temporally varying environment through the storage effect (K”
- PERFORMANCE TRADE-OFFS AMONG TROPICAL TREE SEEDLINGS IN CONTRASTING MICROHABITATS (2005, background): “To the extent that communities are heterogeneous in space, such rank reversals in response to microhabitat can lead to coexistence (Tilman 1982, Kneitel and Chase 2004).”
- The spatial scale of plant-animal interactions: effects of resource availability and habitat structure (2011, background): “Moreover, among these controlling processes are also biotic interactions between species, such as competition or trophic relationships (Kneitel and Chase 2004).”
- Challenges in linking trait patterns to niche differentiation (2016, background): “…instance, Adler and Muller-Landau (2005) showed that the degree to which Janzen–Connell effects maintain diversity in trees depends on the relative scales of dispersal limitation and enemy-mediated density dependence. just local resource competition (Kneitel and Chase 2004, Kraft and Ackerly 2010).”
- From Elements to Function: Toward Unifying Ecological Stoichiometry and Trait-Based Ecology (2017, background): “Organismal replacement along nutrient gradients can also be driven by this trade-off (Leibold, 1996), which ultimately has consequences for biodiversity within communities (Kneitel and Chase, 2004).”
- Tree–grass coexistence in savannas revisited – insights from an examination of assumptions and mechanisms invoked in existing models (2004, background): “…the model invokes the trade-off between competitive ability and colonization potential (Levins & Culver 1971; Levine & Rees 2002; Amarasekare 2003; Kneitel & Chase 2004), with the added caveat that the competitive rankings of trees and grasses and their colonization potential change in response…”
- Studying invasion: have we missed the boat? (2005, background): “Dispersal also is central to growing research on metacommunities because it is the mechanism that links local and regional community dynamics (Leibold et al. 2004) and because tradeoffs between dispersal and competitive abilities mediate local community structure (Abrams & Wilson 2004; Kneitel & Ch”
- The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology (2004, background): “A synthetic perspective on metacommunities would be a great improvement in understanding how communities are structured by the joint action of processes operating at both local and regional scales (Amarasekare 2003; Kneitel & Chase 2004).”
- Interactive and cumulative effects of multiple human stressors in marine systems. (2008, background): “…33% for heterotrophs, 27, 37 and 36% for studies that measured population-level responses, and 23, 30 and 47% for studies that measured community-level responses, with neither comparison significantly different (trophic level chi-square = 1.47, P = 0.48; response level chi-square = 0.71, P = 0.73).”