Testing intraguild predation theory in a field system: does numerical dominance shift along a gradient of productivity?

By Elizabeth T. Borer, Cheryl J. Briggs, W. Murdoch, Susan L. Swarbrick. 2003

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/28992d8e0e0be703326418d0ac228194c03e752e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. A. Janssen
2. Pablo A. Marquet
3. A. Roos
4. M. Sabelis
5. M. Arim
6. J. Lundgren

In Insect Science

1. A. Janssen
2. Pablo A. Marquet
3. M. Arim

In Plant Science

1. A. Janssen
2. Pablo A. Marquet
3. M. Arim

Citations in the corpus

• Intraguild predation: a widespread interaction related to species biology (2004, background): “In spite of these theoretical developments, empirical evidence for the effects of IGP on species coexistence and dynamics are mainly limited to microcosm experiments and parasitoid systems (Morin & Lawler 1996; Morin 1999; Amarasekare 2000; Borer et al. 2003).”
• INTRAGUILD PREDATION USUALLY DOES NOT DISRUPT BIOLOGICAL CONTROL (2006, background): “Although several studies tested various predictions of the theory of intraguild predation (Holyoak and Sachdev, 1998; Morin, 1999; Diehl and Feissel, 2000, 2001; Borer et al., 2003; Price and Morin, 2004), only few studies tested whether intraguild predators can exclude intraguild prey at high pro”