Trust: Forms, Foundations, Functions, Failures and Figures

By Guido Möllering. 2003

475 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c18642146e3f35d509a534abea5b0cfae17f3bf3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

In Strategy and Management

In Philosophy

Citations in the corpus

Social capital, firm embeddedness and regional development (2005, background): “Other authors such as N (2002) have recognized a distinction the North West and the North East are separated by four places in the competitiveness league.between thick and thin trust.”
The impact of contract characteristics on the performance of public–private partnerships (PPPs) (2016, background): “From a neo-institutionalist perspective, the specific investments (knowledge, money, material) made by partners in a PPP make those partners vulnerable (Deakin and Mitchie, 1997; Nooteboom, 2002).”
Unpacking social capital in Economic Development: How social relations matter (2007, unknown): “When measuring social capital not as group membership but as trust, similar criticisms apply (see, for an in-depth discussion of trust, Nooteboom 2002).”
Trust Repair After An Organization-Level Failure (2009, background): “Employees’ perceptions of their organization’s trustworthiness can be derived from shared cultural beliefs; values and norms (Nooteboom, 2002); forms of cultural control (Das & Teng, 1998; Perrone, Zaheer, & McEvily, 2003); and artifacts, such as work stories, legends, and value statements.”
Creating a High-Trust Organization: An Exploration into Organizational Policies that Stimulate Interpersonal Trust Building (2008, background): “Trustworthiness encapsulates a distinction between ability (or competence) and intentions (e.g. Mayer et al., 1995; Nooteboom, 2002): Apart from being able competently to perform the future actions that the trustor expects, trustees also need to have good intentions.”
What makes public-private partnerships work? Survey research into the outcomes and the quality of cooperation in PPPs (2018, background): “The trusting actor assumes that the other will take his/her interests into account, although he/she can never be certain about it (Rousseau et al. 1998; Nooteboom 2002).”
Perceived Obstacles to University–Industry Collaboration: Results from a Qualitative Survey of Italian Academic Departments (2014, background): “…collaboration partners affects the perceptions of both firms and academics of the barriers to working together (McEvily, Perrone, and Zaheer 2003; Nooteboom 2002), researchers and industrialists are aligned to different organizational environments and cultures, implying that they have different…”
Trust in Complex Decision-Making Networks (2007, background): “…uncertainty about opportunistic behavior is reduced and the feeling that other actors will exercise their goodwill in the search for innovative solutions is increased (Deutsch, 1973; Lundvall, 1993; Nooteboom, 2002; Parker & Vaidya, 2001; Ring & Van de Ven, 1992; Woolthuis, 1999; Zand, 1972).”
Knowledge (2017, background): “An important distinction made in the literature is between the micro and macro foundations of trust (Nooteboom, 2002).”
Empirical test of the trust–performance link in an international alliances context (2012, background): “published about the concept (e.g. Hosmer 1995; Kramer and Tyler 1996; Gambetta 1998b; Nooteboom 2002).”
The Importance of Trust for Investment: Evidence from Venture Capital (2016, background): “Guiso, Sapienza and Zingales (2006), Möllering (2006), and Nooteboom (2002) review this literature from different angles.”
Towards an Interdisciplinary Conceptualization of Trust: A Typological Approach (2007, background): “Consistent with the emerging consensus to treat trust as a multifaceted and interdisciplinary construct (Adler, 2001; Kramer, 1999; Lewis and Weigert, 1985; Moellering, 2006; Nooteboom, 2002; Rousseau et al., 1998), all four delineations can be treated as valid with distinctive foci from distinctive”
Differences in social capital between 54 Western European regions (2005, background): “P et al. (1993) and regional governments. The reason Putnam et al. specifically study the degree of civic community membership P (2000) phrased this in a more popular way by arguing that ‘a society that relies on generalized is that ‘Citizens in a civic community, though not selfless saint”
Social capital and growth in European regions : An empirical test (2005, background): “We refer to Nooteboom (2002) for an excellent overview of the trust literature.”