On the nature of attitude-behavior relations: the strong guide, the weak follow
By Rob W. Holland, Bas Verplanken, A. van Knippenberg. 2002
202 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c17e22d88e31496814de63693761351e03de0ddb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- John Th⊘gersen
- T. Crompton
- Tigga Kingston
- Janette Webb
- L. Steg
- Richard E. Petty
- P. Briñol
- K. Lacasse
In Social Psychology
- John Th⊘gersen
- T. Crompton
- Tigga Kingston
- George Y. Bizer
- L. Steg
- Zakary L. Tormala
- J. D. de Groot
- James N. Druckman
In Sociology and Political Science
- John Th⊘gersen
- J. Krosnick
- T. Crompton
- Tigga Kingston
- George Y. Bizer
- Richard E. Petty
- Zakary L. Tormala
- P. Briñol
Citations in the corpus
- Simple and Painless? The Limitations of Spillover in Environmental Campaigning (2009, background): “It is suggested that engaging in a particular behaviour may have one or more effects: First, the individual’s attitude towards performing the specific behaviour in question may change (Holland et al. 2002b).”
- Cute, Creepy, or Crispy—How Values, Attitudes, and Norms Shape Human Behavior Toward Bats (2016, background): “Attitude strength is an important consideration for interventions because strong attitudes are more likely to persist over time, resist change, influence information processing, and predict behavior (Petty and Krosnick 1995; Krosnick and Petty 1995; Holland et al. 2002).”
- Exploring the Latent Structure of Strength‐related Attitude Attributes (2006, background): “And many investigators have averaged importance and certainty to create composite indices (e.g., Bassili, 1996a; Eagly et al., 2000; Haddock et al., 1996, 1999; Hodson et al., 2001; Holland et al., 2002; Miller, 1965; Prislin, 1996; Theodorakis, 1994).”
- Attitudes and persuasion. (2006, unknown): “These evaluative abstractions vary in strength, which in turn has implications for persistence, resistance, and attitude-behavior consistency (Holland et al. 2002a, Petty et al. 2004).”