Exploring the Latent Structure of Strength‐related Attitude Attributes
By P. S. Visser, George Y. Bizer, J. Krosnick. 2006
208 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02e7e420f872a3457be0988c3bd305c40996f6fb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Richard E. Petty
- P. Briñol
- B. Wagner
- James N. Druckman
- Andrew Luttrell
- Zakary L. Tormala
- Derek D. Rucker
- Kenneth G. DeMarree
In Social Psychology
- Richard E. Petty
- P. Briñol
- James N. Druckman
- Andrew Luttrell
- B. Wagner
- Zakary L. Tormala
- Derek D. Rucker
- Bertram Gawronski
In Sociology and Political Science
- P. Briñol
- Richard E. Petty
- James N. Druckman
- Andrew Luttrell
- B. Wagner
- J. Kuklinski
- Zakary L. Tormala
- Derek D. Rucker
Citations in the corpus
- The Unmet Potential of Interdisciplinary Research: Political Psychological Approaches to Voting and Public Opinion (2009, background): “(Also, it is worth noting that political knowledge, despite being commonly used to measure motivation, might not adequately capture the construct of motivation; see Visser et al. 2006).”
- Making it moral: Merely labeling an attitude as moral increases its strength (2016, methodology): “The other attitude strength variables were assessed using a collection of measurement items adapted from prior research intheattitudestrengthliterature(forareviewofattitude strengthmea-surement procedures, see Visser et al., 2006; Wegener, Downing, Krosnick, & Petty, 1995).”
- Dynamic Public Opinion: Communication Effects over Time (2010, unknown): “Data available from the authors show that the attitude strength feature (processing mode) significantly correlates with other strength characteristics, including attitude importance and latency (Visser, Bizer, and Krosnick 2006).”