Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of Its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on I Think

By Elise Kärkkäinen,. 2003

517 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c00c70b3ce828394a9926ea0a921b162d9bc18d3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. Olcay Sert
2. Barbara A. Fox
3. Sandra A. Thompson
4. Steve Walsh
5. Arie Verhagen
6. Li Li
7. K. Rajagopalan

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Barbara A. Fox
2. Olcay Sert
3. Sandra A. Thompson
4. Steve Walsh
5. Arie Verhagen

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Sandra A. Thompson
2. Olcay Sert
3. Barbara A. Fox
4. Steve Walsh

Citations in the corpus

• Responses to Wh-Questions in English Conversation (2010, background): “Daniel’s response is first delayed by a micropause, then the stance-marker I think (Kärkkäinen, 2004; Thompson, 2002), and then the approximator about.”
• The interactional management of claims of insufficient knowledge in English language classrooms (2013, background): “Kärkkäinen (2003), however, criticises Tsui’s analysis for its ‘preoccupation with the notion of face at the expense of discussing textual functions’ (cited in Pichler, 2007, 175).”