Supercomplexity and the Curriculum
By R. Barnett. 2000
382 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bfef43b1a760a1da0dec56149a646ea1942f55f6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Tuija Ukskoski
- Maria Ruohotie-Lyhty
- Merja Kauppinen
- Johanna Kainulainen
- Tommi Mäkinen
- H. H. af Segerstad
- Emma Kostiainen
- H. Hult
Citations in the corpus
- From senior student to novice worker: learning trajectories in political science, psychology and mechanical engineering (2006, background): “@a view of human being located neither in operations and technique nor in intellectual paradigms and disciplinary competence but in the total world experience of human beings.”
- About the Triggering of UN Sustainable Development Goals and Regenerative Sustainability in Higher Education (2019, background): “Recent research is composed of specialists of multifaceted analysis, dealing with what Ronald Barnett called “supercomplexity” [105,106].”
- Meaningful learning in teacher education (2018, background): “…this split between knowledge and emotions has also been at the core of higher learning, even though the absence of affect has been found to lead to the reification of human thought and action and holding learning to a satisfactory level instead of more through learning processes (Barnett, 2000).”