Foreign language and mother tongue

By István Kecskés, T. Papp. 2001

324 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bfc6e8818cf33da122a517b65d0019de292fd60a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Acquisition by processing: A modular perspective on language development (2004, unknown): “Available evidence supports this prediction (Kecskes and Papp, 2000; Cook, 2003).”
THE ACQUISITION OF LEXICAL AND GRAMMATICAL ASPECT (2004, unknown): “These results are very interesting, because they do not confirm the results obtained in most L3 studies on general Valencia, 1994; Lasagabaster, 1997) and imply that the study of specific areas of language acquisition can present different patterns.”
Teaching Minoritized Students: Are Additive Approaches Legitimate? (2017, background): “…how and knowing that—include common underlying proficiency (Cummins, 1981), common operating system (Baker, 2011), common underlying conceptual base (Kecskes & Papp, 2000), and common underlying reservoir of literacy abilities (Genesee, Lindholm-Leary, Saunders, & Christian, 2006).”
First and second language knowledge in the language classroom (2010, background): “Scholars interested in language awareness have noted that this can also be a two-way street: talk that makes comparisons across languages has the potential to develop learners’ metalinguistic awareness in ways that may also benefit knowledge of the L1 (Cook, 2003, 2005; Kecskés & Papp, 2000).”
Third or Additional Language Acquisition (2007, unknown): “Most studies on non-native linguistic influence have been concerned with one-to-one type of associations, hence with instances of transfer between two non-native languages, or between the non-native language and the native language (Cook, 2003; Kecskes and Papp, 2000; Pavlenko, 1999; Pavlenko and Ja”
Convergence as an optimization strategy in bilingual speech: Evidence from code-switching (2004, background): “1 The two languages are, however, constantly available (cf., Kecskes and Papp, 2000).”
On my mind: thoughts about salience, context and figurative language from a second language perspective (2006, background): “The interlanguage approach is about the emerging second language, rather than about a unique symbiosis of two languages, a ‘dual’ language, as it is affected by the dynamic nature and bi-directionality of transfer, as well as by conceptual blending (Kecskes and Papp, 2000; Kecskes and Cuenca, 2005).”
What variables condition syntactic transfer? A look at the L3 initial state (2010, result): “…L2 1 Although some recent work has demonstrated that an L2 in adulthood can result in regressive interference effects on the native L1 system (e.g. Kecskes and Papp, 2000; Cook, 2003), such effects are different from what is observed in L3 studies that analyse effects on the L2 with respect to…”
THE EFFECTS OF THE SECOND LANGUAGE ON THE FIRST (2009, background): “Likewise, Kecskes (2000) believes that bilinguals perceive their language differently than monolinguals.”