The place of universities in the system of knowledge production

By B. Godin, Yves Gingras. 2000

403 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Political Science and International Relations, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bee2363f9a3326583ba62b744679ea81915216af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Political Science and International Relations

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Revisiting Academic Capitalism in Canada: No Longer the Exception (2010, background): “…in the 1980s and early 1990s to be economic drivers in terms of workforce development and the creation of new products (Friedman & Friedman, 1990; Godin & Gingras, 2000; Henry, Lingard, Rizvi, & Taylor, 2001; Skolnik, 1983), nations began to target funds toward applied research programs in…”
Research, teaching and performance evaluation in academia: the salience of quality (2017, background): “The behaviour of these academics is guided more by their intrinsic motivation to produce and disseminate knowledge at high standards of excellence (Deci 1971; Godin and Gingras 2000; Westergaard 1991) than by managerial practices that evaluate their work (Kallio and Kallio 2014).”
Universities in National Innovation Systems (2006, background): “Several studies (Godin and Gingras, 2000; Hicks and Hamilton, 1999; see below for further discussion) support the “Mode 2” assertion that that cross-institutional collaboration and diversification in knowledge sources have grown, but indicate no such decline.”
The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? (2010, background): “In institutional terms, this structural change from a political to a knowledge-based economy has made the universities most salient to the system [24, 25].”
Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept (2006, background): “According to Peter Haas (1992), epistemic communities can “influence national governments and international organizations by occupying niches in advisory and regulatory bodies.”
Beneath the tip of the iceberg: exploring the multiple forms of university–industry linkages (2011, neutral): “However, rather than diminishing their importance as producers of scientific knowledge (Godin and Gingras 2000), it has changed the nature and execution of that production, and especially the way in which they interact with industry.”
Introduction to the special topic section on mining Web resources for enhancing information retrieval (2007, background): “Note that the majority of journal papers in many fields are written by authors from universities ( Godin and Gingras, 2000 ).”
Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society (2013, background): “Collaborative links with the other Triple Helix actors have enhanced the central presence of universities in the production of scientific research over time (Godin and Gingras, 2000) disproving former views that increasing diversification of production loci would diminish the role of universities in”
Public Policies to Support Basic Research: What Can the Rest of the World Learn from US Theory and Practice? (And What They Should Not Learn) (2001, background): “In addition, a number of writers have pointed to the lack of any evidence about the relative growth of mode 2 at the expense of mode 1 (Pestre, 1997; Weingart, 1997; Godin and Gingras, 2000; Shinn, 2000).”
The roles of universities in fostering knowledge-intensive clusters in Chinese regional innovation systems (2015, background): “Compared to other actors, the contribution of the universities to industrial innovation is becoming increasingly critical (Etzkowitz 2003; Godin and Gingras 2000; Mowery and Sampat 2004).”