Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept

By Naubahar Sharif. 2006

454 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6afbfdef5653e9374ceb9f22af3380f0a9c00562

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems (2012, background): “It enjoys wide currency in both academic and policy-making contexts (Sharif, 2006) and is considered a useful and promising analytical tool for academic study and for the development of innovation policy-making, fostering an understanding of innovation processes and determinants (Edquist, 1997;…”
INNOVATION POLICIES FOR DEVELOPMENT: TOWARDS A SYSTEMIC EXPERIMENTATION- BASED APPROACH (2009, background): “Innovation system research emerged as a response to dominant neoclassical paradigms in policy making (Mylteka and Smith 2002, Sharif 2006 ) providing an alternative explanation of how innovation takes place and how DUI in combination with STI trigger innovation beyond R&D.”
National Innovation System (2009, unknown): “See also Sharif ð2006Þ.”
National Systems of Innovation: Post Script: Innovation System Research – Where It Came From and Where It Might Go (2010, background): “More recent ones are Balzat and Hanusch (2004) and Sharif (2006) .”
Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: The case of Australia (2011, methodology): “E-mail address: mark.dodgson@uq.edu.au (M. Dodgson). approach and the extent of its explanatory powers (see e.g. Sharif, 2006), and the methods used to assess how innovation systems work and their performance (e.g. Edquist, 2005).”
Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries (2009, background): “Innovation system research emerged as a response to dominant neoclassical paradigms in policy making (Mytelka and Smith, 2002; Sharif, 2006)”
Moving innovation systems research to the next level: towards an integrative agenda (2017, unknown): “The influence of the NIS concept, in particular, was very strong because it was positioned in opposition to the prevailing neo-classical approach to economic policies for enhancing the competitive advantage of countries (Sharif, 2006).”
Innovation Policy: Rationales, Lessons and Challenges (2017, background): “Sharif (2006) and Fagerberg and Sapprasert (2011) trace the emergence of the national innovation system approach.”
Rationales for Public Policy Intervention in the Innovation Process: Systems of Innovation Approach (2010, methodology): “For the sake of simplification and clarity, we leave aside in this summary the contributions made by the new growth theory and the new economics of science and technology that, as argued before, have kept most of the neoclassical premises intact (Nelson, 2004 cf Sharif, 2006).”
Inside the high-tech black box: A critique of technology entrepreneurship policy (2014, background): “Instrumental in this respect is the role of systemic theoretical approaches towards understanding innovation (Lundvall, 1992; Metcalfe, 1997; Sharif, 2006; Dodgson et al., 2011; Warwick, 2013).”
Systems of Innovation (2009, background): “At the national level, the notion of innovation systems has been used amongst others in Sweden, Finland and the Netherlands, as well as in supra-national organisations such as the OECD (1997 and 1999), the European Commission, UNCTAD, and even the World Bank d IMF (Sharif, 2006).”
National innovation systems and the intermediary role of industry associations in building institutional capacities for innovation in developing countries: a critical review of the literature (2015, background): “In this way, the NIS concept has always been intrinsically linked to public policy (Sharif, 2006).”
What is evolutionary about ‘regional systems of innovation’? Implications for regional policy (2009, background): “The disagreement over the presence or absence of a RSI in all regions echoes a similar debate in the NSI literature (Sharif 2006).”
Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries: Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting (2011, background): “Innovation system research emerged as a response to dominant neoclassical paradigms in policy making (Mytelka and Smith, 2002; Sharif, 2006)”