Classroom Practices at Institutions with Higher-than-Expected Persistence Rates: What Student Engagement Data Tell Us.

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Exposure to Effective Instruction and College Student Persistence: A Multi-Institutional Replication and Extension (2011, methodology): “For the most part, taking into consideration all of the teachers with whom you’ve interacted with at [institution name], how often have you experienced each?” We employed the same 10-item scale of vetted reliability and validity used by Pascarella et al. (2008), as well as by many of the studies des”
From Theory to Action: Exploring the Institutional Conditions for Student Retention (2010, background): “, Blumberg, 2000; Johnson, Johnson, & Smith, 1998; Major & Palmer, 2001; Smith, 2000; Springer, Stanne, & Donovan, 1999), there are but a few studies on the impact of active learning on student success (e.g., Braxton et al., 2008; Braxton, Milem et al., 2000; Laird et al., 2008).”
What Student Affairs Professionals Need to Know About Student Engagement (2009, background): “For example, distance learners reported higher levels of academic challenge and reflective thinking—a component of deep learning as defined by Nelson Laird et al. (2008).”