A review of methods, data, and models to assess changes in the value of ecosystem services from land degradation and restoration

By K. Turner, Sharolyn Anderson, Mauricio Gonzales-Chang, Robert Costanza, S. Courville, Tommy Dalgaard, E. Dominati, Ida Kubiszewski, S. Ogilvy, Luciana L. Porfirio and 8 more. 2016

320 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af22e7ea575f4b53e97d7372bfd6fd1d6bdfb679

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

The ecological economics of land degradation: impacts on ecosystem service values. (2016, methodology): “As more and better information becomes available, or if one wanted to do a more detailed regional scale study, more sophisticated bene ﬁ t transfer methods or other modeling methods can be used (Bateman et al., 2013; Schmidt et al., 2016; Turner et al., 2016).”
Valuing natural capital and ecosystem services toward the goals of efficiency, fairness, and sustainability (2020, methodology): “For example, integrated, dynamic, spatially explicit computer modelling is increasingly being used as a tool to address the complexity of interactions that lead to ES production (Higgins et al., 1997; Boumans et al., 2002, 2015; Costanza and Voinov, 2003; Bagstad et al., 2013; Turner et al., 2016).”
The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services. (2018, background): “For this, new holistic approaches are needed which are more time and cost effective and can tackle multiple problems efficiently (Favretto et al., 2016; Turner et al., 2016).”
The future value of ecosystem services: global scenarios and national implications (2017, methodology): “Obviously, much more elaborate and sophisticated modelling and analysis can be done (Boumans et al., 2002, 2015; Turner et al., 2016), but this is left for future studies.”
Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? (2017, methodology): “…spatially explicit computer modelling is increasingly being used as a tool to address the complexity of interactions that lead to ecosystem services production (Higgins et al., 1997; Boumans et al., 2002; Costanza and Voinov, 2003; Bagstad et al., 2013; Boumans et al., 2015; Turner et al., 2016).”