Transcendental values and the valuation and management of ecosystem services

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The impact of information, value-deliberation and group-based decision-making on values for ecosystem services : integrating deliberative monetary valuation and storytelling (2016, methodology): “Environmental worldview did not signi ﬁ cantly in ﬂ uence monetary values and the other psychometric items did not adequately load onto hypothesised factors (Raymond and Kenter, 2016) and were thus not included in the model.”
Shared values and deliberative valuation: Future directions (2016, background): “Nonetheless transcendental values can change when specifically challenged (Bardi and Goodwin, 2011), and several deliberative valuation studies in this issue (Kenter, 2016c; Kenter et al., 2016b; Raymond and Kenter, 2016) demonstrated changes not just in WTP following deliberation, but also in the r”
Ecosystem services and the idea of shared values (2016, background): “…contextual values may need to be formed (at least formed in part) through formal and informal deliberation; these same processes may also help to order the shared priority given to transcendental values, which are likely to be largely pre-formed (see also Raymond and Kenter, 2016 in this issue).”
The Deliberative Value Formation model (2016, unknown): “This conceptualisation is particularly salient because both monetary valuation and non-monetary approaches to valuing ecosystem services have so far largely ignored transcendental values (Raymond and Kenter, 2016).”