Women on Boards: The Superheroes of Tomorrow?
By Renée B. Adams. 2016
396 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/be0150888f27ed2662821a6a94749bc234b268f5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Gender Studies
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- M. Atif
- John Antonakis
- M. Goergen
- Jens Rowold
- Philippe Jacquart
- Heike Bruch
- R. House
- Neal M. Ashkanasy
Citations in the corpus
- On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications (2017, background): “, that more women means better performance); however, well-done science shows that it may not matter or may even reduce performance (Adams, 2016; Matsa & Miller, 2013).”
- Does board gender diversity affect renewable energy consumption? (2020, background): “If director gender differences in preferences are the same as “typical” gender differences, then it is plausible that increasing board gender diversity will lead to different and better board dynamics and decision making (Croson and Gneezy, 2009; Adams, 2016).”
- Female CEOs and Core Earnings Quality: New Evidence on the Ethics Versus Risk-Aversion Puzzle (2018, neutral): “The past three decades have, however, witnessed significant increases in corporate, national and supra-national governance reforms, laws and affirmative initiatives explicitly aimed at increasing women’s participation in senior corporate executive roles (Adams 2016; Srinidhi et al. 2011).”