BARGAINING THEORY AND INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
By Robert Powell. 2002
431 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bdbeb6ec94152dbde6cc9d6574264379be8be9dc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
- Branislav L. Slantchev
- Dan Reiter
- Andrew H. Kydd
- Sylvain Chassang
- G. P. Miquel
- Robert Powell
- John Duggan
- Jeffrey S. Banks
In Sociology and Political Science
- Branislav L. Slantchev
- Dan Reiter
- Robert Powell
- Andrew H. Kydd
- G. P. Miquel
- Sylvain Chassang
- John Duggan
- Jeffrey S. Banks
Citations in the corpus
- A General Bargaining Model of Legislative Policy-making (2006, background): “The theory has found numerous applications, including distributive politics (Baron and Ferejohn 1989), government formation (Merlo 1997; Diermeier, Eraslan, and Merlo 2002), international relations (Powell 2002), and bankruptcy (Eraslan 2002a).”
- When Can Mediators Build Trust? (2006, background): “2 For a review see Powell (2002). or power (Kydd 2003; Rauchhaus 2005; Smith and Stam 2003).3 Another form of uncertainty that can cause conflict is mistrust.”
- War as a Commitment Problem (2004, background): “…as Schelling 1960, 5, who observed that most “conflict situations are essentially bargaining situations+” Wittman 1979 provides a path breaking analysis+ Powell 2002 surveys this work+ International Organization 60, Winter 2006, pp+ 169–203 © 2006 by The IO Foundation+ DOI:…”
- Economic Shocks and Civil War (2009, background): “Powell (2002) provides a survey of this literature.”
- How Initiators End Their Wars: The Duration of Warfare and the Terms of Peace (2004, background): “…of four values: (1) defeat , if the initiator was exterminated or capitulated unconditionally because of inability to continue fighting; (2) concessions, if the initiator agreed to an armistice and concluded an agreement that was disadvantageous with respect to its war aims or the prewar status…”
- Which Side Are You On? Bias, Credibility, and Mediation (2003, neutral): “In bargaining situations, conflict is often avoidable if the parties have complete information but may erupt if there is uncertainty about resolve or other factors (Fearon 1995; Powell 2002).”
- Exploring the Bargaining Model of War (2003, background): “30 Smith 1998; Smith and Stam 2002; Filson and Werner 2002b; Powell 2002b. 31 Perkins 1993, 141; Harrison 1985, 91.”