Exploring the Bargaining Model of War

By Dan Reiter. Perspectives on Politics, 2003

342 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f6f4f629792c070f050d28e30e84d5770e1735f1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. William Reed
2. Anna K Jarstad
3. Branislav L. Slantchev
4. Desirée Nilsson
5. Robert Powell

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Anna K Jarstad
2. Branislav L. Slantchev
3. Desirée Nilsson
4. William Reed
5. Bear F. Braumoeller
6. Anne E. Sartori
7. Isak Svensson
8. Paul K. Huth

In Sociology and Political Science

1. William Reed
2. Anna K Jarstad
3. Branislav L. Slantchev
4. Desirée Nilsson
5. Bear F. Braumoeller
6. Robert Powell
7. Anne E. Sartori
8. Isak Svensson

Citations in the corpus

• The Principle of Convergence in Wartime Negotiations (2003, result): “As Reiter (2003) points out, this contradicts the earlier interpretation which treated fighting as detrimental to bargaining because of the expectation that the winning side inevitably expands its demands (Wittman 1979).”
• From Words to Deeds: The Implementation of Power-Sharing Pacts in Peace Accords (2008, background): “Our argument follows the line of reasoning underpinning bargaining models and the literature on costly signaling (e.g., Fearon, 1992, 1995; Kydd, 2000; Reiter, 2003).”
• Information, Power, and War (2003, background): “3. For a summary and review of bargaining theory as it has been applied to world politics see Reiter, 2003 .”