Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability

By Thomas Dyllick, Kai Hockerts. 2002

3,894 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bdadd9dd6a42ff7621ad1a5dd5b8b0c43640a713

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

From global to local: reshoring for sustainability (2016, background): “This extends to impacts on societal capital, which benefits individuals and their communities through education, health and welfare, and social development (Dyllick and Hockerts 2002).”
Business and Climate Change: The Climate Response of the World's 30 Largest Corporations (2009, background): “To be ecologically sustainable, a system should not cause emissions beyond what the environment can handle, and should not consume resources ‘‘at a rate below the natural reproduction, or at a rate below the development of substitutes’’ (Dyllick & Hockerts, 2002, p. 133).”
Can businesses move beyond efficiency? The shift toward effectiveness and equity in the corporate sustainability debate (2006, methodology): “Dyllick and Hockerts (2002) (see Figure 1) argue that sustainable corporations have to demonstrate how their business practices go beyond eco- and socio-efficiency to include the additional criteria of ecoand socio-effectiveness, sufficiency and ecological equity (sometimes referred to as…”
Sustainable supply management: An empirical study (2012, background): “Lots of companies experience difficulties with their sustainable business development management even if they agree that nowadays their activity depends considerably on their responsibility towards their partners and stakeholders (Dyllick and Hockerts, 2002).”
Sustainability Report in Small Enterprises:Case Studies in Italian Furniture Companies (2009, background): “1002/bse • Corporate sustainability (Dyllick and Hockerts, 2002; Schaltegger and Burritt, 2005) – defined as ‘the meeting of the needs of a firm’s direct and indirect stakeholders without compromising its ability to meet the needs of the future stakeholders as well’ – in fact, what appears in the re”
The Value Relevance of Reputation for Sustainability Leadership (2014, background): “(Dyllick and Hockerts 2002, p. 131) The notion of CS is nowadays related to issues such as protecting the environment, fighting against poverty, countering corruption, promoting human rights, ensuring health and safety at work.”